Has anyone seen the Mr. Toad T-Shirts inside the shop near PhilharMagic? Does anyone think that this might mean we may see a return of Mr. Toad's Wild Ride as part of the Fantasyland expansion? I hope so!:sohappy:
Just because they sell merch of a lost attraction does not mean its coming back.Has anyone seen the Mr. Toad T-Shirts inside the shop near PhilharMagic? Does anyone think that this might mean we may see a return of Mr. Toad's Wild Ride as part of the Fantasyland expansion? I hope so!:sohappy:
Has anyone seen the Mr. Toad T-Shirts inside the shop near PhilharMagic? Does anyone think that this might mean we may see a return of Mr. Toad's Wild Ride as part of the Fantasyland expansion? I hope so!:sohappy:
Has anyone seen the Mr. Toad T-Shirts inside the shop near PhilharMagic? Does anyone think that this might mean we may see a return of Mr. Toad's Wild Ride as part of the Fantasyland expansion? I hope so!:sohappy:
Anything would be better than what is planned.
True. You beat me to the punch.In short no. Disney will not hesitate to capitalize on the lingering popularity of a past attraction or character (ie Dreamfinder) by selling merchandise related to it. Mr Toad is not coming back for no other reason that about 99% of the worlds population under the age of 20 does not even know wow Mr Toad is.
Mr. Toad really was not a great ride. At all... end of story. Winnie the Pooh was a significant trade-up in terms of ride-for-ride value.
For those of you who are still remenessing and haven't been over to Disneyland lately, go ride it and you'll be like "oh...that's it?"
I'm just saying...
Forget going to Disneyland - just watch some videos online of the ride and you'll start to see. Yes Mr. Toad was a fun ride and I remember enjoying it, but looking at the videos recently, I never realized how much it relied on essentially painted boards for the characters and scenery. Think the heffalump and woozel room for the entire ride. Overall its kind of disappointing in today's world.
I think that the distinction that it brought was in the fact that it dealt with dark concepts like hell and the boldly-displayed consequences of bad decisions. That was a stark contrast to the rest of the Disney interpretations surrounding it. Fairy tales themselves were usually starkly-drawn morality tales, but not usually the Disney versions. So, some saw Toad as refreshly different. That was all.
As for the mechanics of the ride, it was more like a traditional carnival ride than anything else. (Just like Snow White's Scary Adventure's mechanics today.) It was story that mattered here, not effects.
Mr. Toad really was not a great ride. At all... end of story. Winnie the Pooh was a significant trade-up in terms of ride-for-ride value.
For those of you who are still remenessing and haven't been over to Disneyland lately, go ride it and you'll be like "oh...that's it?"
I'm just saying...
If it wasn't called "Wild Ride" it would have never gotten any of the legendary status that it has today. If it were just named "The Adventures of Mr. Toad" it would be the worst ride ever created. As kids, many of us took the billing it being "Wild" as something more extreme above all other dark rides, when truly it was the least themed of the lot. Plus, it was only half the size as Pooh is now with split tracks.
I think that the distinction that it brought was in the fact that it dealt with dark concepts like hell and the boldly-displayed consequences of bad decisions. That was a stark contrast to the rest of the Disney interpretations surrounding it. Fairy tales themselves were usually starkly-drawn morality tales, but not usually the Disney versions. So, some saw Toad as refreshly different. That was all.
As for the mechanics of the ride, it was more like a traditional carnival ride than anything else. (Just like Snow White's Scary Adventure's mechanics today.) It was story that mattered here, not effects.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.