And they were the ones who created and approved it! Would be more grateful if they asked and expected some quality.
And they were the ones who created and approved it! Would be more grateful if they asked and expected some quality.
The door coaster was ALWAYS a weak idea. Fans, especially collectively, are terrible Imagineers (just like they're collectively terrible scientists, terrible doctors, etc. - this isn't an isolated problem). They saw a coaster-like sequence on film and said, "build that!" with little or no further thought. The one interesting element of the idea - going through the doors - is absent from the ride. All of this is especially infuriating because Imagineers created a MUCH better Monsters Inc ride concept for Tokyo.We spent 20 years begging for this coaster and got buyer’s remorse when it was finally announced? Then we said, “I hope it’s not just a ride replacing a 20-minute show,” and they said, “fine, you can have a new show AND the coaster,” and we said, “no, thanks.”
smh
yeah I feel like they could probably do something a little better there but whatever. A toppled Waternoose statue or being pulled under by tentacles. The eyeball motif is fine but not really a compelling sculpture.Alas, poor Miss Piggy. Replaced with...an eyeball
View attachment 827393
The area was designed to look broadly normal but be slathered in bright, silly, giddy Muppet nonsense everywhere. Disney removed all of that. Now they're bringing back a much more subdued, less clever version of the sane thing. It's all just a more boring version of the original Muppet area.I think most probably agree with the sentiment that the trend of everything being a unified IP land is tired, but I’m not really bothered by the appearance of this area. It looks like a nicely refreshed version of what is already there, and it blends well with whatever will remain of the original cityscape corridor just outside of it. It obviously begs the question of why it needs to be a Monsters land in the first place, but I don’t think it looks uninteresting. I suppose what you mean is that Monsters is not a fanciful enough IP to warrant converting this entire area when it could’ve just been placed into a more unassuming facade in the area and still worked seamlessly alongside Muppets, but that’s a bit different from the area looking uninteresting; if it is so now, then it always has been.
What I and many others here asked for is to leave classic attractions alone and add new ones.And THEN they said “Fine we will give the muppets a new home in another fan favorite idea in RNRC, and also (presumably) work with the Jim Henson Company to preserve the muppetvision show” and people said “nah”.
I get your sadness but it’s kinda frustrating. They are legit giving us EVERYTHING we asked for, even if the circumstances suck.
In 2024 they hadn't just saturated the resort with coasters-in-a-box (and rides with height restrictions more generally).The key there is the 20 years.
20 years ago, the company was very different and beginning two decades of neglect that has lead up to the catch up and lackluster product we so often get now. 2004 Disney theme parks compared to now is very different.
Populist Disney assumes that it is accessible and has mass appeal. Nothing in their recent history suggests that this is what Disney is looking to do. The record low brand perception and lower/flat attendance lean into opposite of this.The era of Populist Disney is upon us, and it's awful.
In 2024 they hadn't just saturated the resort with coasters-in-a-box (and rides with height restrictions more generally).
Populist Disney assumes that it is accessible and has mass appeal. Nothing in their recent history suggests this. The record low brand perception and lower/flat attendance lean into opposite of this.
If anything a lot of what they've been doing (and failing at) shows how out of touch they are.
Very true, especially when the attractions are mostly thrill rides with height requirements or stage shows. There isn't a lot of variety at HS.And if the best we can do is say the first time in fifteen years the park has 20 attractions again, maybe that is a sign and evidence of the failure of the last fifteen to twenty years.
I highly doubt this. 25 years ago they only had 5 rides and a few more shows.But there lies the problem. I haven't gone back to find it, but I believe DHS has LESS attractions than it had like 25-30 years ago (or at least the same amount maybe?). The problem is the development period you are talking about was a net negative from an attractions perspective. And that's what gets people mad. I love MV3D. Had they built stuff out, and just decided due to age, it was time, I'd be sad. I'd be upset. But I'd get it. I can argue all day at the quality of the transformation, but the bottom line is that the transformation is not adding capacity to improve guest experience. I'm glad this is at least adding something with this, but they need a lot more stuff.
Someone mentioned if everything goes in, we would be 1 over 2007 levels, so I may be thinking 15 years ago. I don't have a list of defunct vs current attractions right now, but point is all the transformation really added a net 0 at best.I highly doubt this. 25 years ago they only had 5 rides and a few more shows.
Was the frontier land shooting gallery considered an attraction?Very true, especially when the attractions are mostly thrill rides with height requirements or stage shows. There isn't a lot of variety at HS.
For context:
- MK's most attractions was 40 between 2005 and 2008 (only difference was Timekeeper replaced by Monsters Laugh Floor) and they're currently at 36, soon to be 34 without Tom Sawyer and Liberty Belle.
- Epcot currently has 32 attractions, the most its ever have. It did have 30 between 2003 and 2007 before it went on a decline, so Epcot overhaul did end up adding more attractions to the park.
- Animal Kingdom's best year was 2019 at 25 attractions. It's currently at 23 but next year it will be down to 19 before Tropical Americas opens it will be back up to 22/23 if the playground gets built because the Fossil Fun Games are listed as an attraction and won't get a 1:1 replacement
Was the frontier land shooting gallery considered an attraction?
Let’s hope so. What if it’s not really gone though. The place went from Pizza Planet to Pizza Rizzo when the land changed to Muppets what if they just kept the awful pizza and just changed the name to Pizza Roz or something Monsters related.On a positive note, humanity is now forever grateful to Disney and Bob Iger for finally ridding the world of Pizza Rizzo.
Let’s hope so. What if it’s not really gone though. The place went from Pizza Planet to Pizza Rizzo when the land changed to Muppets what if they just kept the awful pizza and just changed the name to Pizza Roz or something Monsters related.![]()
Let’s hope so. What if it’s not really gone though. The place went from Pizza Planet to Pizza Rizzo when the land changed to Muppets what if they just kept the awful pizza and just changed the name to Pizza Roz or something Monsters related.![]()
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.