Monorail Rumor late 90's

Mikejakester

Active Member
Original Poster
Hey
I heard this from my uncle that lived there in the late 90's,
It's an old rumor and you guys have probably talked about it before but I never got to know if it was actually true.

He told me that disney was trying to built a a monorail striaght in from the airport. In other words. I Monorail track was giong to be build from Walt Disney Resort to the Intl. Airport. And the goverment did not let them.

how much truth is there behind this?
 

MrPromey

Well-Known Member
Actually, there is *some* truth to this rumor… It is actually a light rail and it isn’t that Disney wants it but a government wouldn’t let them have it. The talk of this project is part of a larger one that would put light rail all through the area and where the disagreement comes in is the layout of the track. They want their own track that goes from the airport directly to Disney and back… A whole bunch of other businesses would like to see Disney as part of a loop that would also go to International Drive.

I haven’t seen anything in the papers about it for a while but I don’t think that the whole thing has been resolved or laid to rest.
 

niteobsrvr

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by MrPromey
Actually, there is *some* truth to this rumor… It is actually a light rail and it isn’t that Disney wants it but a government wouldn’t let them have it. The talk of this project is part of a larger one that would put light rail all through the area and where the disagreement comes in is the layout of the track. They want their own track that goes from the airport directly to Disney and back… A whole bunch of other businesses would like to see Disney as part of a loop that would also go to International Drive.

I haven’t seen anything in the papers about it for a while but I don’t think that the whole thing has been resolved or laid to rest.

Thats the more recent debate. If I am not mistaken back in the 70's Disney actually did want to build a Monorail system from the Airport all the way to WDW. However, lack of foresight from the governments led to the project never getting off the gournd.

I am betting that the governments would love to have a private investor step in now and build a rail system just about anywhere so long as the county or state didn't have to pay for it. Amazing how things change over 25 or so years.
 

jmarc63

New Member
Originally posted by MrPromey
Actually, there is *some* truth to this rumor… It is actually a light rail and it isn’t that Disney wants it but a government wouldn’t let them have it. The talk of this project is part of a larger one that would put light rail all through the area and where the disagreement comes in is the layout of the track. They want their own track that goes from the airport directly to Disney and back… A whole bunch of other businesses would like to see Disney as part of a loop that would also go to International Drive.

I haven’t seen anything in the papers about it for a while but I don’t think that the whole thing has been resolved or laid to rest.

Thats not exactly accurate,

Back in the mid 80's we had heard the first rumors of a Monorail direct from OIA to a new TTC to be built. As well as expansion of the existing system, then Nothing . as far as the light rail, that was supposed to be an alternative to a Monorail system on property, there is a Monorail or light rail system being proposed for the orlando metro area and a high speed intercity link betwen orlando and Tampa, Thats still being hashed out. In 99 they announced a new system to be built and operating by now, and still nothing. So far these rumors belong in never never land.
 

MrPromey

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by niteobsrvr
Thats the more recent debate. If I am not mistaken back in the 70's Disney actually did want to build a Monorail system from the Airport all the way to WDW. However, lack of foresight from the governments led to the project never getting off the gournd.

I am betting that the governments would love to have a private investor step in now and build a rail system just about anywhere so long as the county or state didn't have to pay for it. Amazing how things change over 25 or so years.

Since his comments were from his uncle who lived there in the late 90’s, I assume he is talking about the current debate since that would be around the time it got started.

Based on the cost of a monorail track stretching that far (at that point, all they had was the express and resort loops to the MK) this would have been a HIGHLY ambitious project which would have involved not only the considerable investment in additional track and additional trains but also the acquisition or condemning of the land in between held by third parties. While they may have *wanted* something like this back on the 70’s it could in no way have been legitimately justified for cost or governmental involvement… or need since such an elaborate system would only have been feeding one park and a few resorts and even after the addition of Epcot and a couple more resorts, the need still wasn’t really there.

Once they began construction of Epcot along with an expansion to the monorail system that cost considerably more than the original system, I don’t think there is any way that Disney would have been able to afford such a thing, especially since the company was in absolutely terrible financial shape and on the verge of a hostile takeover that would have resulted in a total breakup.

In short, there may have been “talk” by someone somewhere of such a monorail track but there is almost no way that it could have been done at the time even if they had gotten full government assistance. I don’t see this kind of thing as being one of those “could have beens” at all.
 

MrPromey

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by jmarc63
Thats not exactly accurate,

Back in the mid 80's we had heard the first rumors of a Monorail direct from OIA to a new TTC to be built. As well as expansion of the existing system, then Nothing . as far as the light rail, that was supposed to be an alternative to a Monorail system on property, there is a Monorail or light rail system being proposed for the orlando metro area and a high speed intercity link betwen orlando and Tampa, Thats still being hashed out. In 99 they announced a new system to be built and operating by now, and still nothing. So far these rumors belong in never never land.

And from what I can recall, a hub for that light rail was to be located near Orlando International. I know that Disney was agreeing only to cooperate if they got their own track which would not be part of the loop that connects to the convention center on International Drive which all of the business on International Drive want... Disney’s deal was that they would cooperate and even help offset the cost of a track going to their property if they got their own track but that they would in no way cooperate if they were put on a loop with other Orlando tourist destinations. Even though it would be possible to get the land condemned and essentially taken from them, it is something that Disney threatened to tie up in litigation.

Here are a few articles about it from Florida papers.

http://www.utu.org/worksite/print_news.cfm?ArticleID=4503

http://www.bizjournals.com/orlando/stories/2002/12/30/editorial1.html

http://www.n-jcenter.com/NewsJournalOnline/Opinion/Editorials/opOPN1021903.htm


Trust me, as a Florida resident who’s city is part of the current roadblock to the high speed rail, I am well aware of the details on it.

As for the 80’s “rumor” of such an airport monorail, you could have “heard” anything but the addition of a full monorail in this direction would have been prohibitively expensive and major overkill... And probably still is today. An elevated light rail could be built and maintained for CONSIDERABLY less and would really make more sense. I mean, if 300 people need to go back and fourth to the airport at the same time all day long, I guess maybe a monorail might make some sense but since the traffic is more fragmented than that, a light rail with more trains on an automated system would cost less offer shorter waits and simplify the process of dealing with people and their luggage.
 

niteobsrvr

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by MrPromey
I don’t see this kind of thing as being one of those “could have beens” at all.

Actually, I would have to disagree on this point for the simple fact that it is this very leg of a transportation system that everyone is arguing about today. It is this leg that could derail the entire highspeed rail system. If Disney had been successful in building the airport line, the current situation wouldn't even begin to be an issue.

As far as funding for the additional line goes, it may not have been as difficult as one might think. First and foremost, when a company really wants the money to do something, they tend to find a way to make it happen.

Second, you have to keep in mind that in the early to mid 70's moving around on a highway was not often the least expensive method of transportation give nthe oil crisis of that decade. Of course this was also probalby one of the factors that prohibited the governments form saying yes because they may well have feared they would have been asked to foot part of the bill. This also would not have been unusual for Disney as throughout the companies history there have been instances of a Disney/Governemtn partnership.

From a personal note as person who has been involved in transportation in this country for quite some time, if we don't start building more mass transportation soon our regrets are going to be greater than our successes in this particular field.
 

garyhoov

Trophy Husband
This debate is a big part of why I'm frustrated Disney hasn't done more on-site since their initial monorail construction.

They have complete control over their property and don't need to worry about the politics that stand in the way of these projects in the rest of the country. Sure, buses are cheap and efficient (so are cinder block buildings and corrugated tin roofs :zipit: oops better not give Mr. Eisner any ideas), but Disney World could be the sort of transportation proving ground that Walt envisioned in many if his sketches if management was willing incorporate that concept into their long range planning.

How can Disney world presume to tell Florida what to do when they haven't taken more impressive steps on their own property?
 

MrPromey

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by niteobsrvr
Actually, I would have to disagree on this point for the simple fact that it is this very leg of a transportation system that everyone is arguing about today. It is this leg that could derail the entire highspeed rail system. If Disney had been successful in building the airport line, the current situation wouldn't even begin to be an issue.

As far as funding for the additional line goes, it may not have been as difficult as one might think. First and foremost, when a company really wants the money to do something, they tend to find a way to make it happen.

The current monorail system in entirety is 13.6 miles long. The shortest track they could have built to the Airport (without a loop and requiring a single train going back and forth) would have been 19 miles and that would have gotten them as far as what was then the Disney Village. It would have been even farther to the TTC which would have been the only logical location since the MK and the MK resorts were all there was…

Even still, this kind of expense could hardly be justified based on the number of guests who would actually make use of it. After all, the majority of guests were staying off property. Even at room capacity, there wasn’t enough demand from WDW for this kind of transportation to even come close to justifying this exclusive line. Otherwise, unless you were flying in from out of town without luggage, it wouldn’t make a whole lot of sense to go directly from the airport to the MK, would it?

Today, 25-30 years later there is a possible need for something but I highly doubt this something is a monorail like we see in use at the resort. Light rail with more cars would make a lot more sense if they were to take a fixed rail approach. If you don’t believe me, I suggest you look up the 30+ page thread we had about the monorails about a year ago. It is still here and has some very valuable insight about Disney’s specific transportation needs from a cast member who deals with that kind of thing. Getting tourists around Disney is NOTHING like getting residents around a busy city.

One last point: The high speed rail is not in jeopardy because of this local issue. It is a totally separate deal that was voted on and added as an amendment to the Florida constitution. There are several factors that are blocking it which include what city it actually ends at in the first leg of construction (it is eventually supposed to go to Miami) and where the money is going to come from to build any of it. The high speed rail will or won’t happen regardless of what happens with Disney and the Orlando area’s light rail (which is currently in jeopardy over the Disney dispute) We voted some expensive things into law last year including this monorail and a reduction of class sizes in the middle of a recession. Our governor spoke out against both of these things before they were voted on and has been looking for a way to kill both of them from day one going as far as to suggest having the high speed rail voted on again.
 

niteobsrvr

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by MrPromey


Today, 25-30 years later there is a possible need for something but I highly doubt this something is a monorail like we see in use at the resort. Light rail with more cars would make a lot more sense if they were to take a fixed rail approach. If you don’t believe me, I suggest you look up the 30+ page thread we had about the monorails about a year ago. It is still here and has some very valuable insight about Disney’s specific transportation needs from a cast member who deals with that kind of thing. Getting tourists around Disney is NOTHING like getting residents around a busy city.


First off, allow me to introduce myself as a former transportation cast member of the Walt Disney World Resort who departed the company last summer to pursue other interests. Also allow me to point out that for the previous 15 years I have made a living managing and planning transportations systems for both goods and people.

That being said, I have been involved with several transportation systems that serve the needs of areas that are exactly like Disney simply because the resorts transportation needs are no different than any city. Just like a city, Disney has two main rushes a day. One of them is at Park opening and the other is at park closing. In the city one is at the morning commute to work and the other is the afternoon commute home. The rest of the day the systems, disney or a city, run service to move smaller numbers of people from place to place.

One Big difference between Disney and A city is that the resort does not scale back transportation during these slower times of the day to a less frequent schedule for obvious reasons. The cities in order to meet the higher demand of Mornings and afternoon simply add extra busses to specific destinations and usually call them express routes.

As for the future of monorail, one only has to do a little bit of searching on the web to see that this method of transportation is far from dead. We all seem to forget that Disney isn't the only monorail system in the world today. The transportation system is currently seeing a resurgence of interest and popularity to solve transportation problems in Cities like Seattle, Las Vegas, St. Pete/Tampa and many areas over seas. There really is no limit to the size of the trains other than how big one wants to build a station. It also solves problems that many cities have regarding availablity of right-away, pollution, and noise. Check out the following website and its links to various systems in planning and production stages for more information.

http://www.monorails.org/
 

niteobsrvr

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by MrPromey
The current monorail system in entirety is 13.6 miles long. The shortest track they could have built to the Airport (without a loop and requiring a single train going back and forth) would have been 19 miles and that would have gotten them as far as what was then the Disney Village. It would have been even farther to the TTC which would have been the only logical location since the MK and the MK resorts were all there was…

Again here Disney was being a little more forward thinking than most politicians and other "community leaders" who claim to have the best interests of the public in mind. At the time, Disney had I beleive three more resorts planned for the Magic Kingdom area and knew that EPCOT would be coming as soon as they figured out exactly what EPCOT would be vs. Walt's vision. They also had seen the traffic jams that were created on World Drive just from one park and a couple of resorts let alone what the future would hold. Unfortunately, many plans for put on permanent/indefinite hold during the Oil Crisis of the 70's while Disney and the World waited to see what was going to happen.

As far as where the line would have ended on Disney property goes, I dont think the Ticket and Transportation Center was ever meant to become quite the hub that it is now. Based on the Master Plan and the original idea for EPCOT, it probably would have been moved to an area much more central to the developed property, an area that pretty much coincides with EPCOT's parking lot. It would be interesting to note that Downtown Disney/Village would not have been a bad location either given the fact that it now has all the amenities a traveler would expect in a large transportation hub in a mjor city.

As for guests traveling with luggage, it would not have been and still is not unfathomable to imagine a monorail (or other mode) car designed with bagage storage for a short trip in mind. I can think of a couple of different ways this might have occurred including each passenger being responsible for his or her own luggaage.

One last point I would like to make is that Walt Disney World's transportation plans are not set in stone. Busses work great and solve the transportaiton problems with a flexible and efficient mode of transportation. One thing I am positive Disney is waiting on is what the light rail and high-speed rail systems will ultimately bring to the Disney property. Once routing, scheduling, and financing have been determined Disney will embark on major changes to the current system to meet the demands of those folks arriving by rail. This could be in ghe form of a new means of transportationon property or just simply the relocation of the transportation and ticket center to a more centralized location.

Regardless of what happens the future of transportation is far from over as the resort continues to chaange and adapt to the needs of the guests as well as the surrounding communities.
 

jmarc63

New Member
Originally posted by niteobsrvr


As for guests traveling with luggage, it would not have been and still is not unfathomable to imagine a monorail (or other mode) car designed with bagage storage for a short trip in mind. I can think of a couple of different ways this might have occurred including each passenger being responsible for his or her own luggaage.


A Monorail car to OIA would probably simular to the car rental busses that pick you up in the drop off lot, seats are removed and a rack is installed towards the rear opposite the rear exit. or simular design, However these cars would need to be dedicated to this line for maxium effecency.
 

skipperg

Member
Read an article in one of the Orlando Papers last year that the state was looking at a high speed rail system between Orlando and Tampa. If I remember they were talking to both Disney and US about having stops along the system.

Several years ago I talked with a Disney rep, in questioning me as to where I was from he mentioned that Disney had been in the Southwestern Pa (PIttsburgh) looking at and purchasing some Old Trolley's. He claimed that they were doing a study on Trolley's vs the Monorail.

Personally I love the Monorail, but the busses are the best current solution for WDW. Breakdowns and maintence can put the monorail down and really tie up the entire system. A broke down bus affects only a small portion of the entire transportation system and can be corrected within minutes.

Again in my opinion I will leave it to the experts at WDW. They do more things right than wrong and when they do something wrong they usually attempt to correct it.

Joe
 

jmarc63

New Member
Originally posted by niteobsrvr
Again here Disney was being a little more forward thinking than most politicians and other "community leaders" who claim to have the best interests of the public in mind. At the time, Disney had I beleive three more resorts planned for the Magic Kingdom area and knew that EPCOT would be coming as soon as they figured out exactly what EPCOT would be vs. Walt's vision. They also had seen the traffic jams that were created on World Drive just from one park and a couple of resorts let alone what the future would hold. Unfortunately, many plans for put on permanent/indefinite hold during the Oil Crisis of the 70's while Disney and the World waited to see what was going to happen.

As far as where the line would have ended on Disney property goes, I dont think the Ticket and Transportation Center was ever meant to become quite the hub that it is now. Based on the Master Plan and the original idea for EPCOT, it probably would have been moved to an area much more central to the developed property, an area that pretty much coincides with EPCOT's parking lot. It would be interesting to note that Downtown Disney/Village would not have been a bad location either given the fact that it now has all the amenities a traveler would expect in a large transportation hub in a mjor city.

As for guests traveling with luggage, it would not have been and still is not unfathomable to imagine a monorail (or other mode) car designed with bagage storage for a short trip in mind. I can think of a couple of different ways this might have occurred including each passenger being responsible for his or her own luggaage.

One last point I would like to make is that Walt Disney World's transportation plans are not set in stone. Busses work great and solve the transportaiton problems with a flexible and efficient mode of transportation. One thing I am positive Disney is waiting on is what the light rail and high-speed rail systems will ultimately bring to the Disney property. Once routing, scheduling, and financing have been determined Disney will embark on major changes to the current system to meet the demands of those folks arriving by rail. This could be in ghe form of a new means of transportationon property or just simply the relocation of the transportation and ticket center to a more centralized location.

Regardless of what happens the future of transportation is far from over as the resort continues to chaange and adapt to the needs of the guests as well as the surrounding communities.


In the original Project x/E.P.C.O.T. master plan had all the resorts around Baylake/Seven Seas Lagoon .MK was a little more west of its current location. I think they were forced to change the plan and revise the project so they could build WDW as a legacy to walt, the rest came out of resort planning and not for planning a city of the future as walt saw it. and the Current TTC was to be connected to the rest of the EPCOT plan in future phases, but that never happened either.
 

Sir Hiss527

New Member
Yes they were talking about a light rail system that would go from the airport to Disney, and to some of the important places across the state. I don't know if these plans are still on or not.
 

MrPromey

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by niteobsrvr
First off, allow me to introduce myself as a former transportation cast member of the Walt Disney World Resort who departed the company last summer to pursue other interests. Also allow me to point out that for the previous 15 years I have made a living managing and planning transportations systems for both goods and people.

That being said, I have been involved with several transportation systems that serve the needs of areas that are exactly like Disney simply because the resorts transportation needs are no different than any city. Just like a city, Disney has two main rushes a day. One of them is at Park opening and the other is at park closing. In the city one is at the morning commute to work and the other is the afternoon commute home. The rest of the day the systems, disney or a city, run service to move smaller numbers of people from place to place.

One Big difference between Disney and A city is that the resort does not scale back transportation during these slower times of the day to a less frequent schedule for obvious reasons. The cities in order to meet the higher demand of Mornings and afternoon simply add extra busses to specific destinations and usually call them express routes.

As for the future of monorail, one only has to do a little bit of searching on the web to see that this method of transportation is far from dead. We all seem to forget that Disney isn't the only monorail system in the world today. The transportation system is currently seeing a resurgence of interest and popularity to solve transportation problems in Cities like Seattle, Las Vegas, St. Pete/Tampa and many areas over seas. There really is no limit to the size of the trains other than how big one wants to build a station. It also solves problems that many cities have regarding availablity of right-away, pollution, and noise. Check out the following website and its links to various systems in planning and production stages for more information.

http://www.monorails.org/

Perhaps Fantasia Bish, a current transportation cast member who has a differing view could post some of his thoughts on this as well… Like what happens after a parade or when it rains or how transporting 300 people at a time or the addition of transfers isn’t a good idea and how one MAJOR way that WDW’s needs differ from those of a major city is that in WDW, a guest must be able to understand the transportation process instantly since they are only there for a short time and are on vacation…

The plans for St. Pete and Tampa (which are two separate projects and are actually an enititive of the counties that these two cities’ are in rather than just the cities themselves) are calling for much smaller automated monorail trains which would be supplemented by both light rail and busses as part of a larger plan to make it possible for a person to get from one random point to another as quickly and easily as possible. Currently they are also looking for funding to be provided by the federal government, local taxes, private financial ‘gifts’ and private investors who would make money off of shop rentals in or below stations, and surrounding areas. If successful, on an average day, they would also move a lot more over much greater distances than Disney does. Also, the Tampa and St. Pete systems (at least the monorail/light rail parts of them) would not be scaled back during non-peak times of the day because plans call for them to be automated and the actual process of brining more trains on and off line has already been determined to be less cost efficient.

I was able to find an online link with ‘official’ information from the Pinellas project if you are interested (but it is mostly fluff my information came from a question and answer session with the engineers developing it): http://www.pinellasmobility.com

Generally speaking, traffic for guests at WDW goes from a park or DTD to a resort and back. That is lots of people from limited multiple locations trying to go to the exact same place at one time of the day and a bunch of people trying to go from the exact same place to limited multiple locations at another. This leads to the question of which is more efficient: Waiting in line for a bus to go directly from one location to the other of waiting in line for a Monrail/Light Rail to go to another location to transfer and wait in line for another Monorial/Light Rail and possibly do the same thing again to take an indirect route with multiple stops some of which (including yours) there may not be room for as a result of the people who have gotten on before you at a previous stop to get to where you want to go…

As you mentioned, their needs are constantly changing and I’m sure they do review their options quite regularly but quite honestly, if it had been up to Disney to figure out how their guests got from the airport to WDW (something that wasn’t and still isn’t Disney’s responsibility) in the 70’s, I would think they would have looked at alternative fuels such as Corn Fuel Ethanol that could be incorporated into existing transportation models with little or no modification needed. I suspect if the fuel problems had continued much longer or worsened, our entire country might have been moved in this direction.

If you haven’t followed the link that PhotoDave posted, I highly recommend you do so because a good portion of this has already been discussed to death around here… :)
 

MrPromey

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by jmarc63
In the original Project x/E.P.C.O.T. master plan had all the resorts around Baylake/Seven Seas Lagoon .MK was a little more west of its current location. I think they were forced to change the plan and revise the project so they could build WDW as a legacy to walt, the rest came out of resort planning and not for planning a city of the future as walt saw it. and the Current TTC was to be connected to the rest of the EPCOT plan in future phases, but that never happened either.

The original “E.P.C.O.T.” plan also called for Epcot (E.P.C.O.T.) to be a real city with real residents having a more natural and versatile transportation needs like that of a real city. The only thing that was really different for the planning of E.P.C.O.T. was that the modes of transportation intrude less on their environment both in terms of pollution and in traffic… Of course, just like the monorails in use the pollution part is sort of misleading since there are still natural fuels being burned to create most of the power being consumed by the monorails and everything else electrical at WDW… It is just that someone somewhere else has to deal with it.
 

niteobsrvr

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by MrPromey
Perhaps Fantasia Bish, a current transportation cast member who has a differing view could post some of his thoughts on this as well… Like what happens after a parade or when it rains or how transporting 300 people at a time or the addition of transfers isn’t a good idea and how one MAJOR way that WDW’s needs differ from those of a major city is that in WDW, a guest must be able to understand the transportation process instantly since they are only there for a short time and are on vacation…

Unless something has changed in the past year, which I admit is entirely possible, Disney doesn't adjust their system in cases of rain or for parade exits. It would be nearly impossible to do so, especially the later parades like SpectroMagic beacuse you also have exit considerations at at least 1 other park if not 2. Part of this has to do with the way scheduling and the union contracts are structured.

As a side note, one of the reasons the Parade and Fireworks are scheduled the the way they are at MK is in an effort to smooth demand for transportation and alleviate general traffic congestion. You can see what happens on nights like 4th of July and New Years when there is a mad rush to leave the park (s).

For guests to be able to understand the system instantly, it is up to the engineers and planners to take this into consideration when designing and planning a system. The better job they do, the easier it all becomes. The trick here is you have to think like someone using the system vs. an engineer or planner. It is that crucial shift of perspective that often makes most designs a little less than ideal once they are completed in reality.

We have drifted this thread a fair amount from its original intention to discuss the addition of a Monorail line from the airport to Disney. It was not my intent to end up discussing the parks transportation issues but to discuss issues related to moving people to and from the entire property itself. As Ii beleive I stated or implied earlier, once the government bodies and Disney decide how the regional systems are going to be developed and interfaced with WDW, then, and only then, can Disney take an effective long-term look at how to move people around the resort property.
 

MrPromey

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by niteobsrvr
Unless something has changed in the past year, which I admit is entirely possible, Disney doesn't adjust their system in cases of rain or for parade exits. It would be nearly impossible to do so, especially the later parades like SpectroMagic beacuse you also have exit considerations at at least 1 other park if not 2. Part of this has to do with the way scheduling and the union contracts are structured.

As a side note, one of the reasons the Parade and Fireworks are scheduled the the way they are at MK is in an effort to smooth demand for transportation and alleviate general traffic congestion. You can see what happens on nights like 4th of July and New Years when there is a mad rush to leave the park (s).

That was my point. With the monorail system in place they can’t logistically even if they want to - be it hourly, weekly or seasonally really. . There is no amount. That is why the express monorail has long waits during these kinds of situations with standing room at maximum capacity and why they have empty cars in some trains at other times of the day. Sure, they may be able to scale down with the monorails but they can’t scale up and running in a loop has it’s own set of problems, especially for the resort monorails. Lets face it, getting to and from any of the parks during peak times is never really an ideal situation but which one is the worst?...

Originally posted by niteobsrvr
For guests to be able to understand the system instantly, it is up to the engineers and planners to take this into consideration when designing and planning a system. The better job they do, the easier it all becomes. The trick here is you have to think like someone using the system vs. an engineer or planner. It is that crucial shift of perspective that often makes most designs a little less than ideal once they are completed in reality.

And in most cases, the easiest solution for guests to understand is the simplest. The simplest solution for a guest would be able to get on one vehicle that takes them from where they are to where they want to go with minimal wait… We have a system like this in my city. They are called cabs. Unfortunately, since only one or two people tend to want to originate from the same point and go to the same location at the same time, they aren’t very cost efficient. That is why we also have busses which make multiple stops, in loops and 90% of the time requires transfers to get from one place to where you want to go which can be confusing and requires a lot of additional waiting… All I’m saying is that a larger monorail system in Disney would be a lot like the busses in my city - more waiting, more confusing, less direct and less specific to the individual rider’s needs. Since Disney has a consistently large number of people going from point “A” to point “B” or point “A’ to point “G” or point “D” to point “A” it is a lot easier to look at their busses as working the way cabs do around here.

Monorail’s are more fun – I’ll give you that – and if they were working optimally to where they met or beat the busses in terms of their primary purpose (cost and time efficiently getting guests from one location to another with the least possible intervention required by the guests) I would be all for them but with a fixed rail system I don’t see how they could. Unless they came up with something offering the ability to switch tracks in real time (sort of the monorail equivalent of a passing lane) it doesn’t seem very likely. I could see them building building bus only roads to elevate traffic and ensure properly scheduled departure and arrival times before something like this even if a light rail does come from the airport to property.In actuality, that is the one time when a fixed rail might make sense because it would be difficult for Disney to set up a hub at the airport itself that would take people directly to their individual resorts from that central location but once on property where Disney is free to build a station of the style and size of their choosing it would still be quicker and easier to take a bus directly to your resort than to get on another monorail or lightrail that may or may not require a transfer and deal with half a dozen stops on the way… And the transfer thing is a whole other can of worms. If guests get confused trying to figure out how to get to Epcot from the Contemporary when there is only one transfer at that point, I don’t see how a newer system that would almost have to be more complicated would help things.

I realize it is easier to be a pessimist about things like this because it is always easier to poke holes in someone else’s theory than it is to come up with your own but I honestly think busses in some form [be they diesel, corn either, electric, fuel cell, boat, Moller ( www.moller.com) or some new technology yet to be invented or widely implemented] will probably be the transportation of choice around WDW for the foreseeable future rather than any kind of a fixed rail and not just because of cost.

Originally posted by niteobsrvr
We have drifted this thread a fair amount from its original intention to discuss the addition of a Monorail line from the airport to Disney. It was not my intent to end up discussing the parks transportation issues but to discuss issues related to moving people to and from the entire property itself. As Ii beleive I stated or implied earlier, once the government bodies and Disney decide how the regional systems are going to be developed and interfaced with WDW, then, and only then, can Disney take an effective long-term look at how to move people around the resort property.

I agree and I actually meant to respond in agreement to the last part of your last post but got a little side tracked. Believe it or not I hadn’t intended to get into this big debate either because it never ever goes anywhere. I just have this tendency to go off in every possible direction in a singe post to cover all my angles which usually gets me in more trouble than I’m trying to get out of when I start… I’d like to say that it was sort of refreshing to get someone from the ‘other camp’ that had more than just “monorails are more ‘magical’” or “monorails are better” to head up their argument with. Usually, people wanting monorails come into this without much thought and then come up with plans for how a monorail system could work that rivals the schematics of a microprocessor in terms of complexity.:)
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom