DisneyWarrior27
Active Member
I refuse to believe that. And I won’t believe it. I won’t.Hand-drawn features are dead for Disney.
I refuse to believe that. And I won’t believe it. I won’t.Hand-drawn features are dead for Disney.
Yes, I don't get the sense that Frozen 2 has a strong reputation as a bad sequel beyond forums like this. It seems more a case of it kind of fading away post-release compared to the original, as will most likely be the case with Moana 2. I'll admit, though, that I was never interested enough to see it despite liking Frozen a lot more than most people on forums like this seem to like it!Frozen 2 is not as maligned by the gen audience though as you guys think. It’s still competitively streamed.
My frustration continues to be that they should have never attempted the TV series to begin with, and Moana 2 should have been conceived as a theatrical venture from the start and have had Lin Manuel Miranda's involvement.
This does seem to be a hangover from the, shall we say, overly ambitious streaming strategy embraced during Chapek's brief tenure. I still feel a little sad at how this has left Luca somewhat off the radar as I really liked that film. While I haven't seen Moana 2, I concur with those who think crafting a Moana sequel should have been more important to Disney considering what a monster the original film has been for them.Sorry, I mean a zero percent chance they continue to make sequels to their biggest films as D+ fodder. There’s no Coco series headed to D+, for example.
Tiana predates this mandate shift back to theatrical. I think Tiana could be shunted towards theatrical, but very unlikely the art style changes.
Though I also found it average, I don’t think it felt made-for-TV. They actually did a pretty good job of disguising the film’s origins as a Disney+ show.2 people on my Instagram today both saying the film is very average and 'Seems more like a TV movie for Disney+'
Im sure I said this would be the case.
Agreed.Though I also found it average, I don’t think it felt made-for-TV. They actually did a pretty good job of disguising the film’s origins as a Disney+ show.
I'm not sure what you mean. It wouldn't have had the 100th to capitalize upon in the marketing if it came out this year, and it didn't have much else going for it as a film. Being an original concept it wouldn't have had a built-in audience to draw upon to way Moana 2 does, and the reviews wouldn't have been any better.My thoughts exactly. I feel things may have played out quite differently with Wish had it come out this year instead.
2 people on my Instagram today both saying the film is very average and 'Seems more like a TV movie for Disney+'
Im sure I said this would be the case.
Wish came out during a peculiar moment when the box office was still in the process of bouncing back and when Disney’s brand was suffering something of a cinematic and possibly reputational slump. Had the film been released in 2019 instead of 2023, it would have done significantly better than it did, and I believe the same would be true of this year. I’m not suggesting it could have achieved anything like Moana 2’s numbers, but I’m convinced it fared much, much worse last year than it would have done under more “normal” circumstances.I'm not sure what you mean. It wouldn't have had the 100th to capitalize upon in the marketing if it came out this year, and it didn't have much else going for it as a film. Being an original concept it wouldn't have had a built-in audience to draw upon to way Moana 2 does, and the reviews wouldn't have been any better.
I think it's unfair that Wish flopped at the box office, even though it has flaws. And I hate to say this, but I blame the executive meddling for that. Because we could've had a Starboy and King Magnifico and Queen Amaya as the first villainous couple. Oh great! Now I'm being negative!Wish came out during a peculiar moment when the box office was still in the process of bouncing back and when Disney’s brand was suffering something of a cinematic and possibly reputational slump. Had the film been released in 2019 instead of 2023, it would have done significantly better than it did, and I believe the same would be true of this year. I’m not suggesting it could have achieved anything like Moana 2’s numbers, but I’m convinced it fared much, much worse last year than it would have done under more “normal” circumstances.
ETA: The fact that the truly awful Chicken Little made more than Wish—and significantly more if you adjust for inflation—bears out my point.
We can’t change the past. But we can learn from the past to do better for the future.I think it's unfair that Wish flopped at the box office, even though it has flaws. And I hate to say this, but I blame the executive meddling for that. Because we could've had a Starboy and King Magnifico and Queen Amaya as the first villainous couple. Oh great! Now I'm being negative!
I hate to admit it, but Wish is indeed the stronger movie in almost every aspect except animation (credit where credit is due, Moana 2 looks stunning). While the lyrics were occasionally awful, I still remember the tune of most of the Wish songs and the general story pretty well, and I haven't seen it since last year.Given the reviews / general response for this, Wish is clearly a stronger movie, and it's a shame it was treated so poorly and overlooked by the GP. No reason for it to have bombed, if Moana 2 is breaking all the records.
I just can't agree. While Wish was indeed a disappointment, I think it's better than most people on this forum give it credit for. It's treated like an unforgivable abomination when it's really just a kind of generic/bland movie that relies too much on the Disney formula without bringing anything new and exciting to the table.I didn't care for Moana 2, but I don't think it's worse than Wish. I don't think anything is worse than Wish. Wish was Disney Animation's worst movie.
Chicken Little wins that prize easily.I didn't care for Moana 2, but I don't think it's worse than Wish. I don't think anything is worse than Wish. Wish was Disney Animation's worst movie.
If I were to rank the bottom 15 Disney movies (from Worst to best)Chicken Little wins that prize easily.
I think much of the music was good. "This Wish" in particular would have made a wonderful addition to the songs Disney uses for fireworks and other nighttime entertaintment, but the film's failure put paid to that possibility.WISH coulda been a good musical movie if the music was good.*
*not a pixie duster
I like most of those films to varying degrees. Chicken Little is probably the only Disney movie I actively dislike and can't imagine ever rewatching. (The Sword in the Stone has no place on that list! It's a wonderful film!)If I were to rank the bottom 15 Disney movies (from Worst to best)
1. Home on the Range
2. Chicken Little
3. Saludos Amigos
4. Ralph Breaks the Internet
5. Make Mine Music
7. Melody Time
8. Moana 2
9. Dinosaur
10. Strange World
11. Bolt
12. Fun and Fancy Free (Mickey and Beanstalk is great, Bongo is not)
13. Wish
14. The Sword in the Stone
15. Oliver and Company
The top three are the only ones I actively dislike, the rest I just think are weaker compared to Disney's other movies.I like most of those films to varying degrees. Chicken Little is probably the only Disney movie I actively dislike and can't imagine ever rewatching. (The Sword in the Stone has no place on that list! It's a wonderful film!)
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.