Michael Eisner to recieve a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame

Mr.EPCOT

Active Member

Tim G

Well-Known Member
Actually, your information is incorrect. Read "Storming the Magic Kingdom" and/or "The Disney Touch". When Michael Eisner and Frank Wells first took control of Disney, they actually planned to shut down the animation division altogether. Roy Disney is the one who insisted that it be kept open.

Oh no... The old roy story again...
You really think Gramps wanted that... The old senile guy only was there for the money... nothin more, nothing less...
 

tigfan

New Member
Oh no... The old roy story again...
You really think Gramps wanted that... The old senile guy only was there for the money... nothin more, nothing less...

His motives aside, the point is that it was Roy, not Michael Eisner, who "saved" the animation division from being shut down.
 

Nemo14

Well-Known Member
What a lot of people here seem to be overlooking is that getting a star on the Walk of Fame is not the "honor" or "recognition" that it appears to be. A lot of people are of the mistaken belief that stars on the Walk of Fame are somehow bestowed upon people by the Hollywood community, by the city of Hollywood, or some central organization (such as the Academy Awards). In actuality, to get a star on the Walk of Fame requires only that an individual be in the entertainment industry and that the individual pay a fee of around $15,000 or more. If I were to make a movie and had an extra $15,000 to spend, I too could be "honored" with a star on the Walk of Fame. There is no nomination or voting process involved. There is no committee that gets together and just decides to honor someone. It generally comes from the individual themselves or from the person's fan club. And these days, getting a star is generally associated with promoting a person's new movie or music CD.

So the debate over whether or not Michael Eisner "deserves the honor" is really a moot point to begin with. He (or someone representing him) paid the fee and he's been involved in the entertainment industry. That's all it takes to get a star.
Absolutely correct! I'm saving up for my star!
 
The thing I don't like about books like those two mentioned is that they are heavily biased against individuals and don't always have information that is non-biased.

Unfortunately I can't remember who was in power before Eisner...I know he was a relation to Disney through marriage, but that's all I'm able to dig outta my head at the moment. His plan...no more animated features ever and then some other plans that Roy didn't agree with. He brought in Eisner and Katzenberg to save Disney and they did just that. I base my information off of what I've read on animation boards and those who lived through those times at Disney. It's almost unanimous (sp?) amongst them that if Eisner doesn't show up...animation is gone. He did steal their building out from under them and slapped them in trailers parked across the lot for most of the production of Little Mermaid (which is a joke when it comes to working conditions).

I usually don't read books that focus on a bias that reflects the views of the author. I will admit that these guys on the animation boards I visit have their own biases, but I'll trust their experiences over someone who had to research their experience.

On a side note...it is true that people have to pay $25000 or be sponsored by a studio, but out of the average 200-300 entries only 20-25 of them are selected for that year to be placed on the walk of fame. So just because you apply doesn't always mean you get selected. (sounds like a credit card deal) There is a committee of five individuals which was headed by the longtime honorary mayor of Hollywood, the late Johnny Grant. He passed away eariler this year and they've yet to select a replacement for him. This group has the final say as to which people nominated get selected for stars.

Here is a link if anyone is interested in starting to get a nomination for themselves ready :)

http://www.hollywoodchamber.net/icons/history.asp
 

tigfan

New Member
The thing I don't like about books like those two mentioned is that they are heavily biased against individuals and don't always have information that is non-biased.

Unfortunately I can't remember who was in power before Eisner...I know he was a relation to Disney through marriage, but that's all I'm able to dig outta my head at the moment. His plan...no more animated features ever and then some other plans that Roy didn't agree with. He brought in Eisner and Katzenberg to save Disney and they did just that. I base my information off of what I've read on animation boards and those who lived through those times at Disney. It's almost unanimous (sp?) amongst them that if Eisner doesn't show up...animation is gone. He did steal their building out from under them and slapped them in trailers parked across the lot for most of the production of Little Mermaid (which is a joke when it comes to working conditions).

I usually don't read books that focus on a bias that reflects the views of the author. I will admit that these guys on the animation boards I visit have their own biases, but I'll trust their experiences over someone who had to research their experience.

On a side note...it is true that people have to pay $25000 or be sponsored by a studio, but out of the average 200-300 entries only 20-25 of them are selected for that year to be placed on the walk of fame. So just because you apply doesn't always mean you get selected. (sounds like a credit card deal) There is a committee of five individuals which was headed by the longtime honorary mayor of Hollywood, the late Johnny Grant. He passed away eariler this year and they've yet to select a replacement for him. This group has the final say as to which people nominated get selected for stars.

Here is a link if anyone is interested in starting to get a nomination for themselves ready :)

http://www.hollywoodchamber.net/icons/history.asp

I've read a number of books on Disney which are clearly biased. Trust me when I say that the two I mentioned are not. In fact, that's actually the reason they happen to be two of my favorite books written on Disney.

The person you are thinking of, who preceded Eisner, was Ron Miller. He was Walt's son-in-law and was (and still is) married to Walt's daughter Diane. They now own a winery in Napa. Ron Miller was, for all intents and purposes, a scapegoat. He was only in the role of CEO for about a year before the management shake-up. And in that time, things were actually starting to turn around for the company. Unfortunately, it was too little too late. It was under Miller's watch that Touchstone Pictures was created, among other things. You are incorrect when you say that Miller was planning to shut down the animated feature division. What you may be thinking of is the fact that the animated films (in fact, pretty much every aspect of the company) took a backseat to the theme parks. Consequently, the animated features were a low priority. This is actually what upset Roy and caused him to resign and eventually spearhead the takeover that was eventually Eisner and Wells.
 

unkadug

Follower of "Saget"The Cult
What a lot of people here seem to be overlooking is that getting a star on the Walk of Fame is not the "honor" or "recognition" that it appears to be. A lot of people are of the mistaken belief that stars on the Walk of Fame are somehow bestowed upon people by the Hollywood community, by the city of Hollywood, or some central organization (such as the Academy Awards). In actuality, to get a star on the Walk of Fame requires only that an individual be in the entertainment industry and that the individual pay a fee of around $15,000 or more. If I were to make a movie and had an extra $15,000 to spend, I too could be "honored" with a star on the Walk of Fame. There is no nomination or voting process involved. There is no committee that gets together and just decides to honor someone. It generally comes from the individual themselves or from the person's fan club. And these days, getting a star is generally associated with promoting a person's new movie or music CD.

So the debate over whether or not Michael Eisner "deserves the honor" is really a moot point to begin with. He (or someone representing him) paid the fee and he's been involved in the entertainment industry. That's all it takes to get a star.

Thanks for the info. :wave: I stand corrected!
 

unkadug

Follower of "Saget"The Cult
from http://www.hollywoodchamber.net/icons/history.asp


Criteria for Star on the Walk of Fame
1. Professional achievement
2. Longevity of five years in the field of entertainment
3. Contributions to the community

The recipient must agree to attend the dedication ceremony.

In case of a fan nomination, a letter of agreement must be sent by celebrity management.

There is a five-year waiting period after death for nominations of deceased individuals. The Committee does not necessarily select posthumous honorees each year.

The Hollywood Chamber of Commerce makes every effort to schedule a dedication ceremony on the date requested by the honoree. A 60-day lead period is needed for required permits, the manufacturing of the star, and advance publicity.

Please be advised that if your nominee is selected and the induction does not take place within five years of the selection date, the nominee must be re-submitted during another voting period.

The sponsorship fee is $25,000*.
The Committee does not accept signature petitions, postcards or letters.
Deadline for nominations is May 31, 2008**.
For more information call (323) 469-8311.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom