What, and spend more money just to make the customer experience better? They are destroying the value of Memory Maker with the worthless automated photo pass systems too. I have become convinced that WDW is completely ruled by bean counters and others who have come to care nothing about customer satisfaction as long as they can make a buck of of us.You'd think they would have fixed this by now
You'd think they would have fixed this by now
Hah! Just yesterday I was trying to select FPs. The website kept telling me I couldn't select a second FP because of a time conflict with another FP when there was none. Turns out that if you click, say, 10:05-11:05 the website would randomly change that time to another time hours later and that did, in fact, have a conflict but there was no way to get the time you actually clicked. It just randomly changed times without telling you. So I turned to the app and that kept refusing to give a second FP at AK after I had selected FoP as the first one. Not a single ride or time worked unless I traded it for the FoP one.I interviewed for a data center architect role for Disney about a year and half ago. I ended up turning the job down because the pay wasnt what I expected. But I did ask what problems they were specifically looking to solve with their existing infrastructure. In short, they consider all their current offerings (MDE, website, ect...) to be stable and the role would be supporting future buildouts, not making anything they currently have better....
So I assume they still view the MDE app and website crashing as non issues.
Sadly - I am in total agreement of what you, and others, are saying.What, and spend more money just to make the customer experience better? They are destroying the value of Memory Maker with the worthless automated photo pass systems too. I have become convinced that WDW is completely ruled by bean counters and others who have come to care nothing about customer satisfaction as long as they can make a buck of of us.
Negative, Ghostrider... Disney wants the planning process to be so onerous, you'll actually NEED your vacation.Theres enough stress involved with planning details and competing for choice dining and FP+ spots to add in a system thats unreliable. You would think that because Disney wants to be looked at as being innovative, advanced and a leader in the industry, and which forces us to use/ rely on this, they would have had a reliable fix in place. Its been ongoing for far, far too long.
Just a guess, but could this have been due to the attraction you were trying to pick had reached it's FP limit for that time period? (Next available not full time conflicted with your later FP).Hah! Just yesterday I was trying to select FPs. The website kept telling me I couldn't select a second FP because of a time conflict with another FP when there was none. Turns out that if you click, say, 10:05-11:05 the website would randomly change that time to another time hours later and that did, in fact, have a conflict but there was no way to get the time you actually clicked. It just randomly changed times without telling you. So I turned to the app and that kept refusing to give a second FP at AK after I had selected FoP as the first one. Not a single ride or time worked unless I traded it for the FoP one.
It happened with every single time slot I selected and for multiple attractions, and only on the website. The second issue (having to trade in FoP to get ANY second FP) was on the app.Just a guess, but could this have been due to the attraction you were trying to pick had reached it's FP limit for that time period?
I long for the days when you could just walk up, get in line and go on the ride. Yes I know.... ancient history.
I'm glad I only go to Disney's job site and then realize "why would I want to do this to myself?" before running the opposite direction. That is interesting and hilariously sad. If they're happy with their current setup, I wonder when there'll be a nice size data breach?I interviewed for a data center architect role for Disney about a year and half ago. I ended up turning the job down because the pay wasnt what I expected. But I did ask what problems they were specifically looking to solve with their existing infrastructure. In short, they consider all their current offerings (MDE, website, ect...) to be stable and the role would be supporting future buildouts, not making anything they currently have better....
So I assume they still view the MDE app and website crashing as non issues.
I'm glad I only go to Disney's job site and then realize "why would I want to do this to myself?" before running the opposite direction. That is interesting and hilariously sad. If they're happy with their current setup, I wonder when there'll be a nice size data breach?
The company I work for is constantly investing in IT. There are so many large scale changes always happening but it's honestly for the best. You gotta keep up somehow!
They've decided they don't want Amazon emailing all their customers with ads for Disney plush toys.But when I interviewed the guys who interviewed me talked like they wanted to keep their infrastructure on prem
I know that at least some applications are already on AWS, but I don't believe they have them configured properly for failover and autoscaling like they should be. Don't ask me how I know.Hopefully they will migrate the MDE system to AWS. The autoscaling of AWS would probably mitigate the crashing every morning issue.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.