March Mania Season Two

kmbmw777

kmbmw777

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
S.P.E.W said:
tumblr_oybuu8byVK1wcn7kno1_400.gif

tumblr_oybuu8byVK1wcn7kno2_400.gif
Click to expand...
I agree!
 
kmbmw777

kmbmw777

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
D Hindley said:
A few more noms:

For Freelance Mini Project, @Skipper2's very new Making the TTA (WEDway) Major League

For Competition Mini Project, Team Kingdom's Big Hero 6 San Fransokyo Drift from Must Re-Do Disney

For Freelance Mega Project, Ideal Buildout's recent DisneySea Paris
Click to expand...
I added the top two to the list.

For the Freelance Mega Project, should I change it to be full parks/resorts allowed. This year, I thought that it would only be lands. However, that rule can be changed very easily! :). Thoughts/Comments on this issue appreciated.
 
Skipper2

Skipper2

Well-Known Member
kmbmw777 said:
I added the top two to the list.

For the Freelance Mega Project, should I change it to be full parks/resorts allowed. This year, I thought that it would only be lands. However, that rule can be changed very easily! :). Thoughts/Comments on this issue appreciated.
Click to expand...
I like attacking big projects.....Like Walt said "Here in Florida, we have something special we never enjoyed at Disneyland…the blessing of size. There’s enough land here to hold all the ideas and plans we can possibly imagine.”
 
Pi on my Cake

Pi on my Cake

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
Yes
kmbmw777 said:
I added the top two to the list.

For the Freelance Mega Project, should I change it to be full parks/resorts allowed. This year, I thought that it would only be lands. However, that rule can be changed very easily! :). Thoughts/Comments on this issue appreciated.
Click to expand...
I think keep the rule since there are already a couple lands from dream parks in here.

But maybe allow a couple exceptions. Like dream parks that are redos of what is already there like @DisneyManOne is doing. Or incomplete parks like Disneyland Brazil by @mharrington and his brainstorming thread. Or my Disneyland Kansas that never got off the ground fully when I started it last year (that's not me nominating it, just using it as an example of what I mean)
 
D Hulk

D Hulk

Well-Known Member
kmbmw777 said:
For the Freelance Mega Project, should I change it to be full parks/resorts allowed. This year, I thought that it would only be lands. However, that rule can be changed very easily! :). Thoughts/Comments on this issue appreciated.
Click to expand...
I'm OK with whatever the consensus is, but do note that the nominated Monstrous Realms (by @D Hindley) is a full park. Should we keep that, remove it, or whittle it down to a single land?
 
spacemt354

spacemt354

Chili's
kmbmw777 said:
I added the top two to the list.

For the Freelance Mega Project, should I change it to be full parks/resorts allowed. This year, I thought that it would only be lands. However, that rule can be changed very easily! :). Thoughts/Comments on this issue appreciated.
Click to expand...
I say leave it as is -- most older comp projects (which I can look up) are not large parks but single lands or attractions...it's only the recency effect of the surge in full park personal projects/brainstorming threads that it seems like more than it is.

Plenty of stuff from pre-2016 still to be nominated!
 
kmbmw777

kmbmw777

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Pionmycake said:
I think keep the rule since there are already a couple lands from dream parks in here.

But maybe allow a couple exceptions. Like dream parks that are redos of what is already there like @DisneyManOne is doing. Or incomplete parks like Disneyland Brazil by @mharrington and his brainstorming thread. Or my Disneyland Kansas that never got off the ground fully when I started it last year (that's not me nominating it, just using it as an example of what I mean)
Click to expand...
I am fine with this rule! So projects like 50 for 50 would be nominated by this rule!

D Hindley said:
I'm OK with whatever the consensus is, but do note that the nominated Monstrous Realms (by @D Hindley) is a full park. Should we keep that, remove it, or whittle it down to a single land?
Click to expand...
I did have for competitive projects that full parks could be nominated (because they were constructed in under a week span). Should that be changed.

spacemt354 said:
I say leave it as is -- most older comp projects (which I can look up) are not large parks but single lands or attractions...it's only the recency effect of the surge in full park personal projects/brainstorming threads that it seems like more than it is.

Plenty of stuff from pre-2016 still to be nominated!
Click to expand...
I agree with all of this.

My consensus is that freelance mega projects should only include “lands” rather than full parks
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom