tirian
Well-Known Member
That's why I go to both resorts and don't compare them the whole time.Found that out after my trip. It's quite the conundrum.
That's why I go to both resorts and don't compare them the whole time.Found that out after my trip. It's quite the conundrum.
I respect that. For me it's very hard for me not to compare them the whole time, since they're so similar! It's like that Seinfeld episode with Bizarro Jerry. The two parks feel like Bizarro Magic Kingdoms!That's why I go to both resorts and don't compare them the whole time.
Well now I'm beginning to wonder if DCA and Disneyland are worth even going to with most of the people here saying they are not even as good as Disney World parks. Ranking DCA below DHS doesn't seem very encouraging to me and Disneyland below Magic Kingdom (though I love both parks).
Haha that is true. I guess there is only one way to find out.Why don't you go and see for yourself? If I based my choice of going to WDW on the comments I see here, I'd never go.
A lot of what makes a theme park, for me, is how the land looks and feels, and immerses you. With that, DL FL wins outright. It might be the most immersive land in DL, outside of the alleyways of NOS.Fantasyland alone could have a thread for comparisons. For everything I prefer in California, there's something I prefer in Florida.
However, I cannot overlook the losses of Toad and SWSA in Florida.
Edit: NFL is pretty but it suffers from very bad—almost amateurish—forced perspective. And of course it doesn't contribute much to the MK's capacity problem, so much as closing some attractions to open others. Still, the placemaking from NFL and the Tangled Toilets really help FL feel substantial.
I hate to say it, but ever since I went to DL I can't go to MK and think about where I'd be in DL and how MK isn't the "true" version of a castle park. It's so weird.I respect that. For me it's very hard for me not to compare them the whole time, since they're so similar! It's like that Seinfeld episode with Bizarro Jerry. The two parks feel like Bizarro Magic Kingdoms!
A lot of what makes a theme park, for me, is how the land looks and feels, and immerses you. With that, DL FL wins outright. It might be the most immersive land in DL, outside of the alleyways of NOS.
(I can't count Frontierland or Adventureland as immersive, even though they surround you. they're basically courtyards. There's nothing to them! They're tiny! And I love them, still!)
NFL has the worst forced perspective. Eric's Castle is built at our level... but has tiny little features. ***?
I hate to say it, but ever since I went to DL I can't go to MK and think about where I'd be in DL and how MK isn't the "true" version of a castle park. It's so weird.
I hate to say it, but ever since I went to DL I can't go to MK and think about where I'd be in DL and how MK isn't the "true" version of a castle park. It's so weird.
Fr.L: the entrance fort in DL is really cool because you feel like you're in a TV western from the 50s, and the ROA is a pleasant theme park stream; but the MK's FrL feels like an actual outpost on a real river. The MK Splash is much, much better than the dinky version in Critter Country.
For someone who grew up going to WDW where everything in the MK, EC, and DAK feels like a *place*, Paradise Pier rips you out of the Disney bubble you've come to expect.
The sound stages in DHS do the same thing.
I always feel like Frontierland got shortchanged in Florida in Favor of Liberty Square. It doesn't even feel like it has a proper entrance like at Disneyland or Tokyo, or Paris. Perhaps them counting on Western River Expedition to anchor the land would explain it.
Casey Jr. blew me away. No, really. Such an innocent, classic, and wonderful attraction that adds so much atmosphere. That back wall of FL with Casey and Storybookland is wonderful.While we're on the topic, my favorite two attractions in DL's Fantasyland are Alice and the Casey Junior Circus Train because they make me feel like I did when I watched Disney cartoons and movies as a kid. That's what Fantasyland is supposed to do. (The Casey Jr. train has incredible views and shouldn't be underrated.)
Yup. And although the place is TINY, it just feels so much more fleshed out. There's not a lot of dead space in Disneyland. MK, though I love it, as lots of space between things. Granted, that design might be a bit more sophisticated, as it allows for bigger aesthetic statements, but Disneyland is just constant STUFF. Everywhere you look, there's something.Same here. I think because at the end of the day it is the original, the only park that is truly Walt's and it defined what a magic kingdom is. And as an added bonus it has more attractions and entertainment than any other magic kingdom in the world.
I love Tokyo Disneyland, Disneyland Paris and the Magic Kingdom. When I come back to the original Disneyland after visiting those parks, I appreciate it so much more.
I always feel like Frontierland got shortchanged in Florida in Favor of Liberty Square. It doesn't even feel like it has a proper entrance like at Disneyland or Tokyo, or Paris. Perhaps them counting on Western River Expedition to anchor the land would explain it.
The RoA is a little lifeless there compared to the other magic kingdoms. At Disneyland, it feels like a big busy river, you have the Mark Twain Riverboats, Sailing Ship Columbia, explorer canoes, and Tom Sawyar Island Rafts bringing that whole area to life with constant kinetic energy. A busy river, as Walt said.
I love Splash Mountain in Florida, but it doesn't belong in a Frontierland. That's been bugging me lately. The presence of the Country Bears in Frontierland from Day 1 could justify the presence of more critters but I think Tokyo got it right: Splash Mountain belongs in a Critter Country bayou setting, so you go ahead and build a Critter Country...with the best Splash Mountain to top it off.
Frontierland at MK was designed with a single row of buildings facing the river, which feels weirdly incomplete or just kinda poorly laid out. At Disneyland, you pass through the stockade and have buildings on either side, which is much better, at least to me.
Disneyland has......? Big Thunder? I guess you're counting all the boat rides separately. I don't see them as being grounded in Frontierland and I think they interact with NOS more.^^^ Disneyland's Frontierland has the same amount of attractions as Magic Kingdom's, in terms of content. In terms of its use of RoA, three of DL's attractions make use of the river. Don't really understand what you're talking about.
Disneyland has......? Big Thunder? I guess you're counting all the boat rides separately. I don't see them as being grounded in Frontierland and I think they interact with NOS more.
Frontierland has Big Thunder Ranch, Mark Twain, Sailing Ship Columbia, Pirate's Lair, Big Thunder and the Shootin' Exposition (don't really see how that's an attraction, but apparently it is). The Mark Twain and the Columbia are Frontierland attractions, they don't interact with NOS at all and have nothing to do with the land's theme.
![]()
I'm sorry, I just feel like half of the things you mentioned don't really feel like they're in Frontierland. They might have the listing for them, but the ROA and Tom Sawyer's Island feels so separate from the Big Thunder/Stockage area. They feel more closely tied to NOS, as do the ships that make their way around the ROA. That's not bad... it's just a different perception. FrL is weaker for NOS's strengths in my view.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.