Heard it happened yesterday.. 50 something year old with a heart condition.... not sure if this has been posted. https://boxden.com/showthread.php?t=2477256
Was just about to post this. Saw it in the Orlando Sentinel. It's terrible that happened. They also released a list of a bunch of injuries/sickness that were part of their quarterly report.Heard it happened yesterday.. 50 something year old with a heart condition.... not sure if this has been posted. https://boxden.com/showthread.php?t=2477256
The quarterly report of incidents published by the Department of Agriculture was released yesterday. The incident in question occurred back in February.Heard it happened yesterday.. 50 something year old with a heart condition.... not sure if this has been posted. https://boxden.com/showthread.php?t=2477256
The quarterly report of incidents published by the Department of Agriculture was released yesterday. The incident in question occurred back in February.
It's news because it happened in a famous place. If someone had a heart attack in an airplane, someone else will find it fascinating. If someone had a stroke at the top of the World Trade Center, someone else will find it fascinating. If someone had a baby on Tower of Terror, it's news because (a) pregnant women aren't supposed to ride it, and (b) it happened at WDW.
Actually, in this case it is not so much about being a popular place and more about safety. The death occurred months ago and did not make the news. The quarterly report on incidents is the only public oversight of the continued safe operation of large, complex machinery at Florida's largest fixed amusement facilities.It's news because it happened in a famous place. If someone had a heart attack in an airplane, someone else will find it fascinating. If someone had a stroke at the top of the World Trade Center, someone else will find it fascinating. If someone had a baby on Tower of Terror, it's news because (a) pregnant women aren't supposed to ride it, and (b) it happened at WDW.
Goes back to my point -- it's only interesting because these people died or "got hurt" in/around Orlando-area theme/amusement parks. Would anybody have cared about a quarterly list of people who died after seeing a movie at their local cineplex?Actually, in this case it is not so much about being a popular place and more about safety. The death occurred months ago and did not make the news. The quarterly report on incidents is the only public oversight of the continued safe operation of large, complex machinery at Florida's largest fixed amusement facilities.
Movie theaters don't strap people into large machines that can and have killed people.Goes back to my point -- it's only interesting because these people died or "got hurt" in/around Orlando-area theme/amusement parks. Would anybody have cared about a quarterly list of people who died after seeing a movie at their local cineplex?
Not usually, and that's a good thing.Movie theaters don't strap people into large machines that can and have killed people.
I think it goes back to "it isn't the norm therefor it is fascinating"Movie theaters don't strap people into large machines that can and have killed people.
The news is the report. The various incidents on their own typically do not make it to the news.Not usually, and that's a good thing.
People have, however, experienced disorientation and other ill effects after watching movies in theaters. And when we hear about it, it's because it's news -- people are interested when other people get killed/hurt, and that interest magnifies when it's in a famous place. In this case, even minor ill effects are interesting (apparently) because they occurred in a famous place. Not denying that safety is a key interest factor (herd mentality) but if it wasn't a place that people thought was famous or notorious, they wouldn't care as much.
This person already had sicknesses before he went on the ride. As there policy states "if you have any injuries or sicknesses do not ride".
Movie theaters don't strap people into large machines that can and have killed people.
There is no evidence to suggest that those involved in these incidents are blaming Disney (which typically suggests seeking compensation). The report from which these incidents, including the death, are known is compiled by Walt Disney World.People dont read those, and then when something does happen they try to place the blame on the park. If people with preexisting medical conditions actually paid attention to those warnings, rides would be half full.
It is reported because we all know that some lawyer is licking his/her chops to sue WDW. Enough lawsuits and before you know it, we will have EKG machines before you board! I know it is extreme, but who knows?I've never understood why stuff like that becomes news. I live in North Carolina where yesterday probably 100's of people died of natural causes. Just because he happened to be on a roller coaster at the time, really means very little and certainly isn't news worthy in my mind. I'm sure a number of those the died here were in cars, or maybe just died in their sleep. Apparently death knows of no standard place to happen. A place like WDW has the population of many moderate sized towns every single day. There are bound to be people breathing their last in a group that big. I'm amazed it doesn't happen daily.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.