DisneyDodo
Well-Known Member
Just saw this, but much of my response to the other post applies to yours as well:There's just weird stuff they did with the design of that one. The exterior in Florida screams e-ticket, even though it isn't - they set expectations much better in California. There are also lost of weird choices inside with scene layout, exposed ceilings, with themed stuff above you, encouraging people to look upwards without even bothering to add a droped ceiling...
Personally, my biggest gripe is that in the scene with Ursula, one of that parks most advanced animatronics, they spin you around her in a tiny room and have your omnimover vehicle pointed away well before you're even out of the room, instead of maximizing your time with that character when they could have turned you around after you were in the tunnel.
If they'd have taken the budget they blew on that unecessary exterior and spent it on the inside to just improve some of the nagging things, I think a lot of people would be way happier with this one.
I'm not debating the validity of your criticism with the ride, but if you want C & D tickets in the parks, you can't hold them to an E-ticket standard.Your critiques of UTS reinforce my point, not refute it. The fact that the queue is so elaborate is a positive, not a negative. I agree that the effects aren't very high-tech, but improving those concerns would make it an "E." I'm not sure that PPF is really any more impressive - it benefits from nostalgia, and its low capacity inflates its wait times, but I wouldn't say its clearly better. My point is not that the ride is so great, it's that not ever ride has to be the best of the best. Right now, the parks are lacking a lot more in quantity (i.e. capacity) than they are in quality.