Legacy Critiques: The Day After Tomorrow

Legacy

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
In the same vein as disaster movies Independence Day and Armageddon, The Day After Tomorrow presents a foreboding outlook for what can lie ahead in our future. In that respect, it leaves other disaster movies in the dust. The coming of the next Ice Age is accelerated by human-enhanced global warming, which provides an unsettling truth to what is shown on the big screen. The science providing backing for the three horrific storms that change the northern hemisphere is convincing enough for an average-Joe like me, and doesn’t become a distraction to the movie. A huge plus.

The foundation for the film is based on Jack and Sam Hall (Dennis Quaid and Jake Gyllenhaal, respectfully), a father-son duo whose bond of trust is pushed to an ultimate extreme as Jack travels by foot to save his snow-bound son who is trapped in the New York Public Library. With Father’s Day coming around the corner, the relationship is poignant and moving. Combined with the message of family, political topics such as global warming, foreign policy and illegal immigration are also tackled. These themes, in the end, provide a provocative experience; causing you to leave the theater thinking about what is presented to you.

But with all disaster films, the story and characters are only icing for the cake of special effects and destruction. The storms, the tornadoes , the flooding of Manhattan Island are terribly real. I have never been so nervous about a disaster movie before. To see walls of water washing away the traffic jams of NYC is a truly unsettling sight. The effects team did a brilliant job of utilizing technology used in Twister and A Perfect Storm, as well as introducing a unique freezing system, and combining them all into a blockbuster smash.

With the Memorial Day weekend kicking off the summer movie season, The Day After Tomorrow provides a grand, adrenalin-pumping opener. As the season’s token disaster flick, it is an amazingly good film. It takes what is typically a far-fetched genre and makes it much more believable, in a disturbingly phenomenal way.

FOUR OUT OF FOUR STARS

Overall- This is best I have seen Dennis Quaid... like that matters. It’s an action-packed thriller, with all the special effects and destruction any disaster movie fan would want.


Side Note-

I am also going to try and see Saved! this weekend. If I do the review will be up afterwards.
 

DMC-12

It's HarmonioUS, NOT HarmoniYOU.
Originally posted by Legacy
FOUR OUT OF FOUR STARS

Overall- This is best I have seen Dennis Quaid... like that matters. It’s an action-packed thriller, with all the special effects and destruction any disaster movie fan would want.


Side Note-

I am also going to try and see Saved! this weekend. If I do the review will be up afterwards.


Good!! Great!!! Glad you liked it!

For those of you who are bashing this movie already.... I quote a Meteorologist here in Chicago that said last night "... whoever said this was a documentary!? :veryconfu Its a movie!!! Its Hollywood special effects! Great movie, but crummy science."

And to quote Dennis Quaid on a late night show the other night: "ITS a MOVIE, people!".

I will definitely be going to go see this next week some time when I get back to Chicago!

Thanks for the great critique, Legacy! :sohappy: :sohappy:
 

Legacy

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Originally Posted By NowInc-
i thought it was kinda short
Really?... they could have developed a couple of the minor characters a bit more, but in regards to length I felt it was about right.
 

NemoRocks78

Seized
I saw it today. The special effects were great, but there was a lot more "drama" then action, which is what the trailers advertised a lot of.

It also seemed a bit short at only two hours long, and the story seemed a bit rushed, so I wish they would have done more. (take a look at Troy, Van Helsing.....all over two hours long)

Overall, it was a good movie. Not the best I've seen this year but it was good. I also wouldn't rush to the theater to see it unless you just have to catch it this weekend (I admit, I would have rather seen Shrek 2 again and this another time).
 

MKCustodial

Well-Known Member
Yeah, I agree with Legacy: I know squal about the climate and the currents, so it was all very believable to me. :D I really liked the movie, and I do think that it would have had dragged out too much if it was longer.

Now I am REALLY curious about one thing, so bear with me... ;) What was the reaction in the room on the following scenes: the one when the vice-president dismisses the Kyoto Agreement and the potential dangers of damaging the environment, and the one when the Americans were shown illegally invading Mexico and everyone only being accepted after the US granted a pardon to Latin America's debt? I ask because down here people have cheered and/or laughed on those particular scenes... With the issues raised after 9/11, and the fact that it's getting harder and harder to even take a vacation in the US, people down here felt like it was payback time, at least in fiction. :lol: I gotta admit it sure was amusing to see that... No harm intended, obviously. :)
 

stranger

New Member
Originally posted by MKCustodial
Now I am REALLY curious about one thing, so bear with me... ;) What was the reaction in the room on the following scenes: the one when the vice-president dismisses the Kyoto Agreement and the potential dangers of damaging the environment, and the one when the Americans were shown illegally invading Mexico and everyone only being accepted after the US granted a pardon to Latin America's debt? I ask because down here people have cheered and/or laughed on those particular scenes... With the issues raised after 9/11, and the fact that it's getting harder and harder to even take a vacation in the US, people down here felt like it was payback time, at least in fiction. :lol: I gotta admit it sure was amusing to see that... No harm intended, obviously. :)

Eveyone in the theatre was cheering when U.S. pardons Mexico's debt and especially when Americans were illegally passing through the border. I'm not lying, just about everyone was yelling out, "How do you like that?" I agree, it was amusing. I thougt it was real funny that the vice president resembled Cheney. Coincidence...? :lol:
 

ISTCrew20

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by NowInc
i thought it was kinda short

Tifani and I saw it last night. We both thought it was very long (compared to other movies we have seen lately, each about 90 minutes long). We both thought it was fantastic though.

On a side note, In the scene when the guy was on the phone in the library, and the water was coming up, I turned to Tifani, and said "Doesn't that remind you of Titanic, when they are trapped behind the gate, and the guy drops the keys?" and she was like "Yea, it does". Then, as the movie kept going, we kept seeing more and more things that reminded us of Titanic. The kicker was when the boat, painted RED AND BLACK goes sailing by. We laughed so hard. I know it wasn't intentional though.
 

imagineer boy

Well-Known Member
I saw it and thought it was pretty good too! Its easy to understand why critics hate it. The special effects were fantastic and the suspence scenes were great. The part with the eye of the storm and the freezing was INTENSE and so were the wolves. But as in every Independance day makers film, there's always some big plot hole. Why were a few people and the news reporter just standing around and watching the tornadoes terrorize the city with debris flying everywhere? How did the wolves survive the flooding in NYC? And why were the wolves so hungry when there was a happy meal of people walking away from NYC? Still, it was a good movie, and I like a good disaster film every once in a while.:D
 

ISTCrew20

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by imagineer boy
I saw it and thought it was pretty good too! Its easy to understand why critics hate it. The special effects were fantastic and the suspence scenes were great. The part with the eye of the storm and the freezing was INTENSE and so were the wolves. But as in every Independance day makers film, there's always some big plot hole. Why were a few people and the news reporter just standing around and watching the tornadoes terrorize the city with debris flying everywhere? How did the wolves survive the flooding in NYC? And why were the wolves so hungry when there was a happy meal of people walking away from NYC? Still, it was a good movie, and I like a good disaster film every once in a while.:D

Because news reporters are idiots, and everyone was laughing when that one got killed by the flying sign.

The wolves...I dunno how they survived. Was it just me, or did they look really fake...like, totally CGI.
 

Michael72688

New Member
The wolves were fake, and I laughed too when the guy got hit, he deserved it, seriously who stands out side when you've got 4 tornados swirling around you
 

Not For Sale

Active Member
Originally posted by Michael72688
I laughed too when the guy got hit, he deserved it, seriously who stands out side when you've got 4 tornados swirling around you

You people haver no common decency. Laughing at death. How dare you...Okay I admit it. I laughed when he was killed. I also laughed when one of the wolves got killed by the door shutting and you see the blood on the glass. I'm going straight to hell. I also thought the helicopters when they passes by looked very CGI to me.
 

Kermit the Frog

New Member
Originally posted by Michael72688
seriously who stands out side when you've got 4 tornados swirling around you

I was a stormchaser in college and got to experience lots of tornadoes, hurricanes and other forms of severe weather. Having a background in meteorology and having many friends who are actual broadcast meteorologists in the media, I don't think you guys would want my opinion of the movie in general. I don't want to spoil your thread.
 

Michael72688

New Member
Now everyone knows that this movie is way out there, but it is still good. They've got great tallent, Quaid, Gyllenhaal, who are the really big stars in the movie and special effects that could knock your socks off. But I think what made this movie was the fact that something similar to this could happen, although not on such a grand scale
 

TAC

New Member
My wife and I saw it this weekend. The special effects were good, but the plot was so-so. Way too much centering on Quaid's character and the VICE president, and not the PRESIDENT of the USA. Too many threads in the movie that were started, but never quite followed through fully, and then as the movie was ending, they had to tie up loose ends. EX: the two guys in the space station...I think there should have been some dialogue of them saying something like "What are we going to do - how are we going to get home."

Check out: Movie Mistakes
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom