Epcot82Guy
Well-Known Member
jmvd20 said:In my opinion future world is a disgrace of its former self. There is no continuity or theme to it like there was back in the 80's. Rides focused on the past, present, and future of many areas. Now it's just a hodge podge of thrill rides. While Soarin, Test Track, and M:S are good additions I just don't feel any connection between these attractions.
I sure hope WDI has a master plan for what they are trying to accomplish with FW. It seems to me it's headed toward small thrill land.
I, in a way, agree, but I actually think this is happening much worse than in Future World. I do think that the almighty dollar was winning for a time, but it is countering back. I doubt that many would claim the Pressler years at Disneyland were a time of great development and prosperity. The "cheap," quick fix of throw in a meet & greet or add an already marketed character is a new trend. I personally abhor this, but it is a valid business decision. I don't know that I can go so far as to say it is creating "inspiring" attractions, but I also don't know that Disney has to be inspiring to be successful. Many people do not want to think or be inspired; it's vacation (and not trying to say that in a condescending way at all - people need escapes). To me, the inspirational, hopeful atmosphere that was usually free of the characters was the best party of Disney. I hated Fantasyland as a child except for Mr. Toad and IASW. Many, however, want Mickey everywhere. That is Disney to them. Unfortunately, to get Mickey everywhere, it has come at the sacrifice of the overarching, mulit-layer themes because the films already provide this. I think I am finally accepting that they cannot co-exist, and Disney should choose one. The half-and-half does not allow for the Disney World of its first two and a half decades, but, if the numbers are coming in, that may not be "bad" objectively (although it may mean I start to lose my enjoyment and passion for the parks).
To get back to your point, I think FW could serve as a wonderful base and have just as much inspiration even with thrill rides. There is nothing that says that a thrill ride can't inspire. I think SM is incredibly inspiring through its simplicity and appeal to a base enjoyment and fantasy we all have. The original attractions were Disney to me. They were not to others. While I would love to see a park maintain this originality as EPCOT Center did, that does not appear to be smart in Disney's eyes. I will say that they must (and almost certainly do) realize that current changes cause a loss of traditional and long-term fans. Any time you change something, that happens. If you replace it with something that creates longevity in the new crowds, it works. I do not know that I agree with the current trends, but they have valid arguments for why people would enjoy them. So, time will tell.