-
The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More -
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
Kingdom Konsultants
- Thread starter WDFAN1977
- Start date
Thrawn
Account Suspended
http://www.kingdomkonsultant.com/
Send her a PM here:
http://forums.wdwmagic.com/private.php?do=newpm&userid=4433
Send her email here:
http://forums.wdwmagic.com/sendmessage.php?do=mailmember&u=4433
Please use PMs in the future instead of addressing a thread to a single person. :wave:
Send her a PM here:
http://forums.wdwmagic.com/private.php?do=newpm&userid=4433
Send her email here:
http://forums.wdwmagic.com/sendmessage.php?do=mailmember&u=4433
Please use PMs in the future instead of addressing a thread to a single person. :wave:
fjm777
Active Member
Thrawn said:
Why do you state this as if it is some rule and you are the enforcer? Your statement seems rather rude despite the :wave:. And you have been rude to me in the past too. So why not just let it go instead of embarrassing people?
It doesn't bother me if someone asks for help on a Disney related topic. Maybe someone can help this person out. And anyway it's nice to see a thread thats not about "Will Disney create a 5th park" for a change.
Please try to send the e-mail to me again. Obviously I didn't get it or I would have contacted you. Did you get it returned? What e-mail address did you use? The site does not require any special software to view as far as I know....
Pam
Pam
Tigger1988
Well-Known Member
fjm777 said:
He was just letting the person know, he didn't call them a moron or something, if anyone else but Thrawn had told them to use PMs in the future you wouldn't have had a problem.
Thrawn
Account Suspended
fjm777 said:
Uhm, I stated it as a rule because, oh, I don't know, it is one? I came into the thread because I thought it might be a topic asking opinions of Pam's services. However, it was a thread that was meant for her, and her privately. I gave him* the information that I could, how to get in touch with her, and I told him* what to do in the future. If you see something wrong with that, be kind and follow the ignore link in my signature so I don't bother you anymore.
* My apologies to the OP if he is actually a she.
AliciaLuvzDizne
Well-Known Member
Thrawn said:
If I came on here with a title that said Kingdom Konsultants and then said "hey Pam, I'm bored, do you want to go to a movie?" THEN maybe a PM would have been a better choice.
But this person came on and asked her a question relating to her business.
Maybe if you had a business and then one day found out that something wasnt working right...wouldnt you have rather had the oppertunity to fix it rather than lose business?
just a thought :wave:
Tigger1988
Well-Known Member
AliciaLuvzDizne said:
Yes this is all true, but a PM would have been better suited than a thread, I don't get why this is being made into a big deal but..hey :wave:
AliciaLuvzDizne
Well-Known Member
because people have a need to argue the reasons people make threads :wave:Tigger1988 said:
maybe someone else was having the same problem and now they know that they are not alone.
Thrawn
Account Suspended
AliciaLuvzDizne said:
But her business isn't wdwmagic.
She may pay to be a sponsor, but she doesn't run the site. She has no more right to have a seperate section for her personal stuff than anyone else. I own my own business, and one of the many things I do is some webhosting. Is it ok for me to tell my clients to come here to contact me? Of course it isn't, and it isn't for Pam. She pays Steve to be a sponsor for the site, but I don't think that makes the forums her business site, it just gives her advertising and business through the sponsorship. Now, I know she didn't tell him to come here and post if he had a problem, because she supplies an email and everything on her site to contact her.
Besides that, a PM or email also gets you in contact with Pam, does it not? Whenever you are creating a thread to address a single person, isn't it easier just to send that message to the single person? What does this thread really have to do with the rest of us? Nothing. Just that someone decided to attack me because I told the OP to use PMs. And, what do you think the quickest way to contact her would be? Either PM or email, right? Well if email didn't work, then the thing I told him to do, PM her, would be second, since I would figure the first thing Pam does when she signs in to wdwmagic is check PMs. Sorry for being long-winded in a dead topic, but your logic just doesn't hold up.
NowInc
Well-Known Member
I found nothing rude about Thrawns post. He even used the word "please". It was more of a message for future reference. I know a lot of people are touchy towards thrawn, but sometimes a bit TOO much.
man..id hate to think of what you guys would have had to say about buzz lightbeer (old member)
man..id hate to think of what you guys would have had to say about buzz lightbeer (old member)
AliciaLuvzDizne
Well-Known Member
hey man i never said it was rude eitherNowInc said:
i was just trying to insert some logic
but sometimes the logic in my brain only works on me
Tigger1988
Well-Known Member
Thrawn said:
I know that, if you read my first reply in this thread I stated that exact thought, its rediculous.
fjm777
Active Member
Thrawn said:
I was not attacking you just saying you are a little bit rough on people sometimes (me for one in the past) and maybe you don't realize it. Sorry if I offended you. I just feel that people should be able to make a mistake without being publicly chastised. It was a very long time before I even knew what a PM was so I fully understand wdfan1977's mistake.
My other point was that there have been threads out here about some of the most stupid things imaginable. Sometimes threads about the same topic over and over and over again. So I don't think this thread threatened the fabric of the universe.
Anyway, I apologize to you Thrawn if I hurt your feelings and anyone else that I made upset. I was just trying to make a point which I obviously didn't make clear.
PencilTest
New Member
fjm777 said:
Sooo...anyone think Disney will create a fifth park?
Nah, I'm just kiddin' (someone's gonna shoot me, I just know it). Seems to me that this whole conversation's kinda going around in circles. I think everyone's made their point, so why keep arguing over the same stuff when no one's gonna budge?
And yes, I'm a newbie. I'm not trying to step on anybody's toes or ruffle anybody's feathers. I'm just sayin'.
fjm777 said:
Thrawn has no feelings to hurt, so no need to apologize.
He/she/it jumps on everyone here on the board. Seems that he/she/it gets some sort of satisfaction from making other people feel small....lack of self esteem maybe?
It's common psychological knowledge that people with low self esteem constantly knock others down to build themselves up. He/she/it is nothing but a self-proclaimed know-it-all and it's a shame that newbies and lurkers (like myself) have to put up with BS like this that discourages us from posting. His nasty, hurtful comments really taint the boards in a negative direction.
I have been silent long enough as far as this bully is concerned.
---C
Tom
Beta Return
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
There are 14 posts in this thread, of the 19 total (not including mine) that are pure argument regarding Thrawn's response to the OP regarding KK's contact info. 14!!!!!!!! Nearly 75% of all the posts in this thread are a friggin ARGUMENT. Meaningless, bandwidth-wasting, time-wasting, childish posts.
The OP has a mere 122 posts (as of now) and probably isn't the "pro" that many of us claim to be. He knew that KK was a frequent poster on this board, due to her many helpful threads and posts as well as her obvious paid advertisements - so he figured this was an appropriate place to try to remedy his problem and get ahold of her. The thread could have stopped after Thrawn's first response, and maybe then followed immediately by KK's confirmation post - end of thread...but NOOOOOO....we're out of things to talk about so we resort to arguing protocal and being self-appointed moderators. Sad.
There are 14 posts in this thread, of the 19 total (not including mine) that are pure argument regarding Thrawn's response to the OP regarding KK's contact info. 14!!!!!!!! Nearly 75% of all the posts in this thread are a friggin ARGUMENT. Meaningless, bandwidth-wasting, time-wasting, childish posts.
The OP has a mere 122 posts (as of now) and probably isn't the "pro" that many of us claim to be. He knew that KK was a frequent poster on this board, due to her many helpful threads and posts as well as her obvious paid advertisements - so he figured this was an appropriate place to try to remedy his problem and get ahold of her. The thread could have stopped after Thrawn's first response, and maybe then followed immediately by KK's confirmation post - end of thread...but NOOOOOO....we're out of things to talk about so we resort to arguing protocal and being self-appointed moderators. Sad.