Apparently the ride was going too fast and crashed into trees. Someone is suing over injuries...can anybody validate this?
Apparently the ride was going too fast and crashed into trees. Someone is suing over injuries...can anybody validate this?
Aren't the boats on a track? I doubt the boat could even go fast enough to knock someone from their seat.
Disneyland's Jungle boats are on a rail and can jump it if they are going too fast. They have to send in a diver to get it back on track. Walt Disney World's have pilons that go into a trough and it is nearly impossible for them to go off track unless the water level goes too high.
Two years ago? More than likely the Skipper isn't even employed by Disney anymore.
Why did they wait so long to bring this to court?
Statute of limitations allows that to happen. It gives a lawyer more time to prepare their case. It probably also gives them the ability to blindside the defendant since the situation happened a while ago. I am a volunteer EMT in NJ and the statute of limitations there is 7 years. If I had a patient who was a minor they get until 25 (7 years from becoming an adult). So if I treat a 1 year old, they technically have 24 years to sue me...and let's be honest about how much I would remember from that day. Thankfully I never plan on getting sued
Just another reason for tort reform.
It's going to take 24 years for an injury to reveal itself? NONSENSE.Nonsense. Often, it may take months for an injury to materialize. The point of a trial, and the court system in general, is to determine the truth. I personally don't believe any of this story, but the statute of limitations has absolutely nothing to do with the facts of the case. What if you had been injured, but the injuries don't materialize for 6 months, yet the statute of limitations was one month? Many crimes have long statutes of limitations as well, allowing prosecutors and the police to investigate and build their case. Should we shorten those as well?
It's funny how people scream tort reform when it's nothing more than a bailout to shield corporations from legal liability. Contrary to popular belief, these huge judgments are non-existent. The huge ones make the news, but those are usually the only huge judgements, and the cases usually warrant them. Do people abuse the courts for financial game? Abslolutely. But it's an unpreventable consequence. Everything can be abused. Disney itself cames the tax system and corporate laws to their advantage, and people do the same in their daily lives. But the simple fact that abuse will occur in and of itself doesn't mean we scrap laws. Should would ban cars because people are going to speed? Should we ban a monetary system because some people will steal? Most so-called frivolous suits are tossed anyway. I'd reccommend people watch the documentary Hot Coffee to see what a sham tort reform really is.
Aren't the boats on a track? I doubt the boat could even go fast enough to knock someone from their seat.
Two years ago? More than likely the Skipper isn't even employed by Disney anymore.
Why did they wait so long to bring this to court?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.