Well, I just heard that Disney's latest "traditional animated" movie, "Home on the Range" bomed. Now, I'm reading the reviews (trying to find out if its really worth seeing) and I kept running into the same flippin' message: "Disney's had it with animation and should just let Pixar do all the movie work from now on." To be honest, I'm really irritated by these statements that these single-minded critics are making about traditional 2-D animation. Because isn't the plot and characters that keep a movie interesting? In other words; Wouldn't "Finding Nemo" be just as good if wasn't in CGI animation but in 2-D animation? Of course it would, right? I'm only bringing this up because I have high hopes of being an animator in a big movie someday and my inspiration for this dream has always come from watching movies like "The Lion King, Aladin, and Mulan." I've always wanted to be a part of making a traditional animated Disney classic but from the way things are going, by the time I'm out of college and ready to take on the Animation World...well...there just might not be an Animation World for me to take on, y'know? Is there anyone out there who understands what I mean? I know it kind of sounds like I'm ranting about some trivial topic but for me, I'm kind of seeing my life-long dream goin' down the toilet. ![Frown :( :(](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png)
![Frown :( :(](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png)