But, Disney does warn people entering the parks that they might be filmed...However, Disney is not "in public." It's private property and they can make the rules of what can and can't happen.
But, Disney does warn people entering the parks that they might be filmed...However, Disney is not "in public." It's private property and they can make the rules of what can and can't happen.
Maybe that's the intent... but it still applies no matter who's taking the video.I think that means filmed *by Disney* so that in case they appear by coincidence in any promotional media or a live broadcast, they can't sue Disney to make Disney remove them from such pictures/video nor demand payment for being an extra in such media.
Which suspension was this?? I'm clueless (unless you mean the push-up "Gaston")!As mentioned earlier there's a youtube channel full of Gaston interactions with strangers here.
It's full of them and you'd have to think that CM's were aware that this same person was filming hours and hours of footage of 'strangers', all seemingly with no problems? I do recall a number of years back one 'Gaston' was suspended for doing push ups on the floor after a guest challenged him and it made youtube. I believe Disney management found it 'ungainly' having a Disney character 'on the floor' although the guests seemed to love it? Perhaps the awkward interaction originally posted was shortly after the suspension of the other 'Gaston' and the other 'Gastons' were sensitive at being filmed? However with that being a big part of the job, I find that hard to imagine.
It’s a weird line... I’ve filmed citizens of Hollywood actors interacting with other guests. But that’s more of a street show and not a meet and greet. But then again it wouldn’t be odd for someone to take a photograph of Belle interacting with a kid during story time. While you may argue that’s a show... actors equity doesn’t consider it a show! Haha.Personally, I think it's absolutely weird and creepy that she was doing this considering she seems to have already had her own encounter with her own kids (I couldn't hear the audio really clear since my DH is working in the same room as me at the moment). I understand that you may catch strangers in your home movies and photos. But she is deliberately filming those guests' interaction (and they had no idea she was going to crop them out later). All I can say is I would've been mortified!!
I
Which suspension was this?? I'm clueless (unless you mean the push-up "Gaston")!
I don't see any problem with recording other people's interactions with characters. If you do have a problem with this, where do you draw the line? It's impossible to take a video or picture in the parks without getting tons of other people in it.
As for Gaston talking to the guest about this, that is totally unacceptable to me. If a rule was being broken a non-character CM should have handled it.
It’s a weird line... I’ve filmed citizens of Hollywood actors interacting with other guests. But that’s more of a street show and not a meet and greet. But then again it wouldn’t be odd for someone to take a photograph of Belle interacting with a kid during story time. While you may argue that’s a show... actors equity doesn’t consider it a show! Haha.
The thing is, if guest would purchase photo pass, they'd get a bunch of generic character pictures of their very own! Then they wouldn't need to take "strange" photos of kids during their M&Gs with the characters! Kudos to you for having patience and not saying something. I either my mom or I noticed that, the mama/grandmama bear(s) would've come out, sadly.The line gets drawn if you start taking multiple pictures of children. I am not objecting to my family being an extra in your vacation documentation, but I do object to my young girls being the main characters.
One trip, at the Mexico Pavilion, my very young girls, were interacting with Donald. I saw a strange lady taking several pictures of the interaction over and over. Instead of making a scene, or getting upset, I conveniently found myself in front of her line of sight, so I think most of the coverage ended up being of my back.
The responses to my post objecting to adults taking multiple pictures of children they do not know, interact with a character, was not favorable from that post, although in that post I said 'a picture' but it was enough pictures to catch my attention and try to prevent more.
Photography etiquette within the parks
I usually take most of the pictures so I use my wife as a spotter. She keeps an eye on things and let's me know if I need to move. We just get PhotoPass for the together pics. They cover most of the popular and crowded spots already. Otherwise, we wait for a clearing, wait until lower traffic...forums.wdwmagic.com
There are 2 factors here to consider. Frequency, and intended audience.How can one record their child's participation in Jedi Academy without 17 other children being featured in it?
The question here isn't what you're personally comfortable with, it's whether this is Disney policy or not.
It suddenly occurred to me that since it was mentioned that there was uncertainty as to whether or not Gaston was still in character that maybe he was. Even if he wasn't, it was not his place to "scold" a guest and be thought of as a legit situation. The response of the lady in question seems to me to be more of a reaction when one honestly thinks they are being punk'd. Gaston is an actor playing a part and she just became part of the show. Therefore, she didn't take it seriously, because she would have no reason to think that it was serious. Don't forget WDW is almost 100% fantasy and make-believe. Let's for a minute say that she was unaware that it might be serious and put yourself in that situation, wouldn't you laugh and think it was just audience participation? I certainly would.I don't think either were technically in the wrong, but the woman's behavior was certainly...annoying?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.