JoeCamel
Well-Known Member
Jetson cars, this is the 21st century....TTC to DAK would be a crazy long journey on a skyliner. They need a monorail, light rail, or peoplemover for that route.
Jetson cars, this is the 21st century....TTC to DAK would be a crazy long journey on a skyliner. They need a monorail, light rail, or peoplemover for that route.
Texas and Florida are warm all year. Jersey is not. It is my understanding snow and ice were major contributing factors to the deterioration of the airtrain at Newark. If the cable is not moving constantly, like a ski lift, ice will be an issue.They are proposing a very similar system to replace the Air Train Monorail at Newark Airport in NJ.
Interestingly enough it will be made by Doppelmayr coincidentally.
I'll that your word for that because I don't know how far it is in a straight like. How does it compare to the furthest point on the current skyway to Epcot (if that is the furthest). I think it is safe to rule out any further addition to the Monorails system and a Peoplemover would require either a different vehicle to protect it from the elements or a covered track so that seems unlikely and to me a light rail for that comparatively short distance seem like something that would rank right up there with a Monorail cost. I'm just speculating. I am familiar with bus costs, but not the rest.TTC to DAK would be a crazy long journey on a skyliner. They need a monorail, light rail, or peoplemover for that route.
I don't see how the maintenance will be less since now each vehicle needs more than just inspecting the springs. I don't know how much regular maintenance there is to the vehicles since the system checks the spring tension at the station on every deployment.Texas and Florida are warm all year. Jersey is not. It is my understanding snow and ice were major contributing factors to the deterioration of the airtrain at Newark. If the cable is not moving constantly, like a ski lift, ice will be an issue.
Back on topic, if a similar stationary cable system was successfully implemented at WDW and proved to be substantially less maintenance, how difficult would it be to modify the existing skyliner system? Could the existing towers carry the heavier “motor on board” vehicles? The existing stations would need to be retrofitted but could be reused. The Boardwalk parking lot turn could become a full hub. An intriguing idea.
It is my understanding that the immobile cab will detach from the cable and air bags will deploy from beneath for a nice safe landingCool concept but it does suffer from one of the same problems as the Monorail, if one car breaks down it takes out the entire line.
The line from Caribbean Beach to Epcot travels about 1.5 miles total. A complete straight line from TTC to the back of DAK (conservation station) is 3 miles and 3.5 to the parking lot.How does it compare to the furthest point on the current skyway to Epcot
Hi. Appreciate the shoutout! We are in discussions with some entertainment complexes, although Disney has historically had their transportation dialed in since the first Alweg monorail in 1959. The Skyliner is pretty cool, and WDW operates the equivalent of a major city transit system. But we're hoping to see Whoosh systems at entertainment complexes soon, relieving parking pressures, shutting guests around with nonstop trips to each destination. I think one of the things that makes Disney theme parks so special is that Walt & Roy understood that the right transportation forms an important part of the immersive experience from the second you set foot in the park.
What happens in the everyday thunderstorms and stronger weather? Everybody find a parking spot and stay there?Hi, because each vehicle propels itself independently, a breakdown of any vehicle or station (or even congestion) means all other vehicles can be dynamically re-routed to ensure that everyone else can safely and conveniently complete their trip.
This is a pretty neat system. How are the cars powered? It seems like a solar cell/battery wouldn't be enough energy. do these pick up power from the stationary line?
Not sure why people are saying these can “go around issues”. They can’t. It’s still a single line system that if a car were to break down for whatever reason, the line is blocked. Unless there’s some Transformers-level propulsion machinery capable of moving a car around a stopped one we aren’t seeing.
Neat concept that I’d love to see in the real world somewhere to better evaluate.
That's the kind of system Walt would have jumped on with both feet.I just saw an interesting article about Sugar Land, Texas (Houston Suburb) looking to possibly implement Swyft Cities, Whoosh Autonomous Elevated Cable and Rail System. It looks like a better implementation of the skyliner gondolas. The vehicles all have their own motors and run on fixed cables and rails instead of like Disney's gondolas that attach to a moving cable. The Whoosh vehicles have batteries, air conditioning and heat, can make turns, and travel directly to YOUR destination bypassing other stations. Loading stations pull off the main lines so that they can be bypassed and they can be scaled to the size needed for each location. The system is easily expandable.
https://www.sugarlandtx.gov/2803/Autonomous-Elevated-Cable-Rail-System
https://swyftcities.com/
Agreed…EVERY rumble of thunder, EVERY bolt of lightning, EVERY TIME the wind picks up, they stop…THAT won’t change no matter how autonomous the gondolas are…it’s a different shade of lipstick on the same pig…What happens in the everyday thunderstorms and stronger weather? Everybody find a parking spot and stay there?
It seems to me like if a concept like this was ever implemented in a place like WDW, some kind of ground based system would make more sense. Something like the peoplemover but with individual enclosed vehicles that are able to go around each other and take different paths. The track/roadway would be more expensive to build out but you wouldn't have the operational issues of a Gondola.Agreed…EVERY rumble of thunder, EVERY bolt of lightning, EVERY TIME the wind picks up, they stop…THAT won’t change no matter how autonomous the gondolas are…it’s a different shade of lipstick on the same pig…
Or Elon Mush can buy Disney resorts from TWDC and install REAL "Rocket Rods" and Robo-Taxis...Or, Disney can just buy a fleet of robotaxis from Tesla and use the existing roads. I'm half joking so please don't derail this thread into a discussion about the delivery and viability of robotaxis.
Really? I thought Disney was juiced to expand the Skyliner.
Imagine Test Track going from 8.8 seconds down to 2.9.......Or Elon Mush can buy Disney resorts from TWDC and install REAL "Rocket Rods" and Robo-Taxis...
Imagine Space 220, but with a REAL tethered-orbit restaurant.
There were plans. I personally doubt they come to fruition, but I have zero information, it's just my gut feeling.Really? I thought Disney was juiced to expand the Skyliner.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.