This is more of a theming question then a ride enjoyability question. If soarin' opened in tomorrowland somewhere and dca never existed, would people be angry about it not fitting thematically, or would they not have cared at all?
I get really weird thoughts sometimes. This is one of the ones I wanted to see results on. : P
True, true, didn't bronze tomorrowland have only ports and 0 new attractions besides the ill-fated rocket rods?I think people would've been thrilled to have anything new in TL.
Best option in that case would be no, they would have never cared.I don’t know which option to vote for because I think Soarin’ would have been a great thematic fit for Tomorrowland.
I was thinking more modern tomorrowland for this question or 90s tomorrowland, but yes it would have been perfect in the 60s-80s.It's a good fit in 1967 Tomorrowland. One that's focused more on science and the world. That's why it works well in Epcot.
They could have a section on why Disney hotel maids only make mimimum wage and how Anaheim's mayor should be recalled because he won't let them build a new parking structure.That's a good question. If Soarin' were opened in Tomorrowland, I think the larger focus of the land would shift towards the environment and conservation. Personally I'd love to see a Tomorrowland that focused on the real issues we're facing.
True, true, didn't bronze tomorrowland have only ports and 0 new attractions besides the ill-fated rocket rods?
Personally I'd love to see a Tomorrowland that focused on the real issues we're facing.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.