I’m interested/curious about all this love for Disneyland Paris. I’ve heard the park is very, very beautiful with an awesome Frontierland but little else. Lacks the charm of the original Disneyland. Poor food quality, poor maintenance, less rides, no Splash Mountain. And I’ve heard Walt Disney Studios Park is even significantly worse than DCA and DHS. I’m thinking this is just a case of rose-colored glasses due to the exoticism of being in a foreign country.
Is Disneyland Paris a better park than Disneyland? For me, no.
But that is not the same as saying that Disneyland Paris has no merit. It is easily the best designed Magic Kingdom, designed with the same level as a Tokyo DisneySea or an Animal Kingdom. Which park is more charming is somewhat subjective, but DLP is, at the very least, the single most charming park Disney has ever built since Disneyland, and I don't see that changing. Somehow they successfully married the scale of a Magic Kingdom with the charm of Disneyland, and that's worth celebrating.
It doesn't have Splash Mountain, but Hong Kong and Shanghai don't either. And while Hong Kong and Shanghai have some incredible attractions that Paris can't match, Disneyland Paris is easily a better, more complete park than either of the Chinese parks.
I'll grant you that the Studios Park and the resort as a whole are still something of a mess, but I don't think anyone who says they love DLP is ever hiding that. The maintenance problem was very real at one time but has now been rectified. Consensus seems to be that it's now far better than, say, WDW.
The smoking is endemic of Europe and much of the rest of the world. I don't love it, but it's not my soil. It's not going to stop me from going if I have an opportunity.
Can Disneyland Paris be frustrating at times? Yes. Should you go anyway if you have an opportunity? Yes. You just can't judge a theme park from the web, or even from what other people are saying.
Finally, I think that it's important to remember that there's more that goes into measuring the worth of a park than its ride count. No other Disney park has the same number of rides as Disneyland, and that's unlikely to change. While Epcot and Animal Kingdom, for example, don't have tons of attractions, there is at least some truth to the notion that you can get just as much out of those parks by really exploring them and immersing yourself in some of the details. While Disneyland is very detailed in its own right, I'd argue that there other parks or areas where the level of detail *surpasses* what you will find in California, including much of the main park in Paris. Parks are so much more than their attraction counts. Walt Disney Studios has more rides than Hollywood Studios, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's a better park.
Only you can determine which is better for your own needs (preferably after you have experienced both in person), but it's not fair to say there's nothing at Disneyland Paris of value.