Goofyernmost
Well-Known Member
I will agree that to them it was, what I am more concerned about is the feeling that more could have been done. You can call the guard out the instant it happened but in order to be useful they first have to get there. Calling them out, is not an instant fix. They were having to travel from home to the location of the useful equipment on the same roads that those trapped vehicles were stopped on. I don't know exactly how much of a delay there was, but I do know that the problem ran for about 10 or more miles in both directions.Been there many more times than I could count. I'm in Maine and I agree our winter storms, blizzards and ice storms are nothing compared to what they call major snow storms down south. We are prepared for those yearly conditions and expect the worst. The worst I had it was the major ice storm years ago that had us out of power for weeks and some people for a month. Power lines down, poles snapped, electrical boxes torn off the sides of houses, homes flooded from frozen pipes.. that was a disaster.
But as minor in comparison to that, the VA incident is/ was called a disaster by many. Especially when the Gov. and others in control should have acted immediately. The stranded and crashed vehicles could have been cleared out easily by calling out the National Guard with their heavy equipment and get a passable road. Inaction caused many people great distress. Ive sat in a broken down car, stranded on a roadway in a below zero snow/ice storm for a night. It was not a simple inconvenience. When you are unable to get help...no food, no heat, no gas, no way out.... its a disaster. Many of those caught on that roadway were elderly, sickly, totally unprepared, with young children and its fortunate many didnt get frostbite or worse. So yes it wasnt as bad as it could have been but for those who had to sit through it... they werent saying it was an inconvenience.
If they had been on the highway instantly they had to work their way back for a long distance both directions. How much snow removal equipment would one expect they have available in an area this doesn't usually have that much snow to deal with. Along with asking the question, do we take what equipment we have and move them back to the location of the problem or keep the rest of the highway clear so as not to have a duplicate problem.
My guess is that it is limited and no matter how big the guard unit is you cannot clear a highway with a tank. Since you are familiar as I am with how snow is handled in the north know that no matter how much experience and equipment we have available it takes people to operate them and they have to be able to get there themselves. We weren't always able to respond that quickly but we didn't have the traffic numbers that are in that area. I just am not one that can honestly feel that what came down was avoidable. Sometimes that time it takes to get things in action can be thought that it can happen at the snap of the fingers. That's what we'd like to think but that is not what reality is.
Last edited: