Your hot take is rides that rides that were opened in the 2000’s are better than rides that were opened more recently?
Soarin’>Ratatouille>Tiana>Laugh Floor
I think they were mainly cause they actually tried to make those rides fit the park they were in. Now all the parks are an extension of MK with IP everywhere.
Half the rides he mentioned as liking are from IP…..
Yes but they fit the park they are in. Unlike Guardians, Tiana's.
I agree Tiana’s was an absolutely dog water change that was totally unnecessary and cheaply done. Soaring though is just a giant screen ride and the laugh factory show is interactive which is nice since Disney keeps cutting that off. Remys 3D is totally unnecessary also and really diminishes from the ride. Too much screen time, but then again soaring is all screen time.
The parks were better in the 1990’s and early 2000’s because everyone wasn’t staring at their phone the entire time
Disagree. Phones have nothing to do with why the parks were better back then. Epcot had their best rides with Horizons and World of Motion. The dark rides were more AA based and not screen based.
uhh some of the most common complaints of Disney these days are how attached to your phone you need to be. Plus having everyone glued to their phone means many people are not “living in the moment.”
Monsters in no way fits in Tomorrowland
Wasn’t that horrible stich ride from the 2000’s also? Lol
Which replaced a ride that fit Tomorrowland in Alien Encounter that fit and was better.
This post isn’t even a hot take lol
I think the 1989-2005 period was the best era for the parks. Eisner knew what he was doing.
He absolutely crushed it in the hotel division
I didn't say it was a perfect decade.
