Again I say from your lips to Walts ears, chew the big guy in heavens ears a bit Walt maybe slip him some free fastpasses and earsThe only problem compared to the 80s is there’s not many old school Disney staff left. Eisner and co were external but there was a big pool of people like Roy jnr, Marty Sklar and others on both the movie and park sides who knew and understood what Disney was. Today I’m not sure if new management would have the same talent pool to draw on -no Tony Baxter, JoeRhode or Glen Keanes for example. On the other hand maybe people like Filoni, Faverau, Fiegie and Docter will be free to be more creative and drive the next renaissance
The only problem compared to the 80s is there’s not many old school Disney staff left. Eisner and co were external but there was a big pool of people like Roy jnr, Marty Sklar and others on both the movie and park sides who knew and understood what Disney was. Today I’m not sure if new management would have the same talent pool to draw on -no Tony Baxter, JoeRhode or Glen Keanes for example. On the other hand maybe people like Filoni, Faverau, Fiegie and Docter will be free to be more creative and drive the next renaissance
Honestly that would be awesome if Chapek hires Rhode back. But alas it will probably not happen.What is needed is someone like Joe Rohde as CCO with a equally powerful CFO who jointly exercise the CEO role, Joe can think in 3 dimensions and has an understanding of what it takes to convert an idea to steel and concrete, The other guys are film guys where 'anything is possible' on film but that leads to disaster in the real world
You don’t need a creative in charge, you just need someone who respects the creatives and their medium. Marvel Studios has largely flourished because it has held off meddling. Parks though went 20+ years being run by people with cursory experience, placed there specifically because they were not parks people.
So Iger was not bad but just picked a bad successor who is mostly continuing what Iger was doing?Anyone on these forums who complained about iger being bad (which he wasn’t) is going to be in for a big wake up call
So Iger was not bad but just picked a bad successor who is mostly continuing what Iger was doing?
I have no idea if it's Iger (I wouldn't think so for various reasons), but someone is definitely trying to force Chapek out/make him a scapegoat. We wouldn't have all these stories coming out in the media otherwise.
They're right that allowing the ScarJo situation to devolve into a public lawsuit was a pretty big blunder, though, if only from a PR standpoint and how it could affect relationships with talent agencies/other stars.
Yes, that is my big takeaway from this. Someone is feeding negative stories about Chapek in which Iger looks good to someone for some reason.
I will say that this is bringing me back to the Eisner days when he/Disney always seemed to be engaged in some sort of public fight with someone. If this happened during the Iger days, he was a lot better at keeping a lid on things.
Correct…and what I love…predictably…is that peeps have latched on to the new parks guy as a “hidden gem”At this point, anyone within the company would be just as bad.
They're all the same people who have been building towards this mess for decades.
The only way for major change to happen is for someone to come in from the outside.
Makes me think that the primary goal here isn't revenue, it's to change guest behavior by weaning them off of FastPass and conditioning them to wait standby for everything.
I think about the resort parking fee the same way. Sure, they're happy to collect those fees, but they'd be even happier if they convinced people to stop renting cars entirely.
You don't want a creative CEO, you want a powerful CCO.
CEOs are administrators. HR, legal, compliance, government relations, investor relations, etc. Actual creative talent would be wasted in that role.
I can bring everyone up to speed:So Iger was not bad but just picked a bad successor who is mostly continuing what Iger was doing?
This isn’t much of a Hollywood mystery…
So tension stories and “failure” quips start coming out just as iger’s two goon/hench people “retire”???
don’t need Sherlock to see where this is coming from
Correct…and what I love…predictably…is that peeps have latched on to the new parks guy as a “hidden gem”
based on what? Cause you need someone. Josh “the face” reminds me of a former guy in that job…who is out doing something/somewhere in w banana republic pants now.
That’s wrong and how we got here…You don't want a creative CEO, you want a powerful CCO.
CEOs are administrators. HR, legal, compliance, government relations, investor relations, etc. Actual creative talent would be wasted in that role.
PresslerJosh seems like a nice guy but in reality he's a 'corporate spokesmodel' with no real power, All real power resides with the Bob's. Maybe Josh gets some power after the Bob's depart. for that one needs a fortune teller and a crystal ball neither of which I have.
No, but keeping Kevin Feige happy probably is and losing him would be a huge financial blow.Keeping Scarlett Johansson happy is nowhere near the top of the Board's priorities and the lawsuit won't exactly sink the company.
What makes you think that's the only way that works? Roy was the CEO and Walt was basically CCO... That worked pretty well.That’s wrong and how we got here…
you want the artist at the top…and the “fixer” at #2…
there are reasons why that works. No need to reinvent the wheel.
That’s wrong and how we got here…
you want the artist at the top…and the “fixer” at #2…
there are reasons why that works. No need to reinvent the wheel.
What makes you think that's the only way that works? Roy was the CEO and Walt was basically CCO... That worked pretty well.
Think of it this way:What makes you think that's the only way that works? Roy was the CEO and Walt was basically CCO... That worked pretty well.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.