OK, but, if it was quickly determined it couldn't have been very well made to look like an explosive. If it was it would have been roboted to a point of demolition and then exploded. If it was that easy to figure out, I don't see how it could have been much of a hoax. But if found to be just an intentional hoax then they should throw the book at them. Not funny in this particular time in history.
Probably not even a hoax bomb. Good possibility it was a map gas cylinder left by a plumber who was sweating new copper.I don't think that is the case. The manager was clearly responding to reporter questions, and the fact that a refurb is underway, and the hoax was in a refurb room, makes it relevant.
I figured that was the case from your first post in this thread. It's along the lines of the baseball broadcast NOT showing the idiot fan running across the outfield to slide into 2nd base, as it only encourages knucklehead behaviour.Just on a sidenote here… On a personal rule, I generally don't report on false bomb threats. That's been the policy of most news organizations that I work with.
Why you ask? Because it just encourages repeat behavior. It's people just looking for attention. Or trying to screw up the works of society.
The general copy it is unless it's ridiculously newsworthy or somehow screws everything up in the world, otherwise I ignore it.
Not only did I not overestimate it, that was the point I was making. I used to work, in public transportation in a college town. Many of the drivers would call in the bomb squad if someone left a backpack on the bus. Me, I'd walk up to it, pick it up and open it to find out who lost their backpack.I think you overestimate the intelligence of the average person. What is obvious to an expert is not always obvious to a regular person especially when it comes to explosives.
some people on here have no sense of
some people on here have no sense of humor whatsoever
remember the incident with the tire monitor on a bus a few years ago?
I was walking around the Swan and Dolphin properties Tuesday afternoon and came upon the massive response: squad cars, fire trucks, all sorts of specialized vehicles, although nobody seemed very excited about it. The rumor at the time was a haz mat spill...
Not only did I not overestimate it, that was the point I was making. I used to work, in public transportation in a college town. Many of the drivers would call in the bomb squad if someone left a backpack on the bus. Me, I'd walk up to it, pick it up and open it to find out who lost their backpack.
Now I am and was well aware that backpacks are a common source of dangerous stuff, but, this was in a town that wouldn't have made the 5th page, left side of a newspaper or over three column inches in the same location even if it had been one, even if it had blown up. To small a target for terrorist to waste their energy on. Might they, sure, but in life one needs to play the odds or we all end up in a dead stop.
When I was a CM in 2004, I once came upon an unattended bag at the hub. A custodial CM was next to me, we had a 30 second convo. He said I was supposed to call it in. Me? I decided that it was 99.9% likely someone just forgot it, went over, looked inside, saw it was normal and walked it up to guest relations. Why? Because why needlessly alarm the park-going public?
I would have done the same. There's a difference between an unattended bag, and a suspicious bag. There are many reasons for a bag to simply be unattended, and those are in far greater number than the reasons the bag COULD be suspicious. It's a judgement call, and you're either wrong and blow up (meh), or you're right and don't stop the operations of an entire resort or scare thousands of families and children unnecessarily.
After the Boston bombings though, I'm much more suspicious of unattended bags.When I was a CM in 2004, I once came upon an unattended bag at the hub. A custodial CM was next to me, we had a 30 second convo. He said I was supposed to call it in. Me? I decided that it was 99.9% likely someone just forgot it, went over, looked inside, saw it was normal and walked it up to guest relations. Why? Because why needlessly alarm the park-going public?
There are certain places, a large airport being one of them, that I would not chance it. Really there is no logical reason for a bag to be unattended in places like that. Yes, people are stupid sometimes, but, it's less likely in a place where you are going to see unattended stuff on a daily basis. A Theme Park and a City Bus is an example of places where that is most common.But, But, But the alphabet soup tells us "See Something, Say Something!", I hear it over the loud speaker and see posters every time I'm at the airport. And we know they are never wrong.....
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.