Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy

DisneyPhD

Well-Known Member
So I get a call on my answering machine tonight from my brother

Hey did you know they are coming out with at Hicth Hickers Moive? And get this Zaphod only has one head. What is that about?" and as he goes on his voice is getting higer and more anoid!

So I call him back and go back and forth with my casting concerns, and he feels the same way. Then he says " you know they tried to do an American verson of Red Drawf too, it tanked." I about died laughing.

I guess my concenrns are family based, as I said a few pages ago. HHGH was rather a tradation in my family growing up! :lol:
 

DisneyPhD

Well-Known Member
catinthehat said:
Wait - you know that Zaphod does have 2 heads right? The 2nd is under his chin instead of shooting out the side of his neck.

New footage has been released. Thought you guys may like this:

http://movies.channel.aol.com/franchise/firstlook.adp


I know that it isn't always there, didn't know about the under the chin thing, hum, guess I will have to wait to see that. I know that when he meet Aurther at a party on earth he only had the one head, so I guess he could change it (like stitch I guess. :lookaroun )

I just was rather funny how upset he (my brother) was.
 

DarkMeasures

New Member
The reason Zaphod has his second head different is because of money. Because of the AA in the TV series always failed at working, that was left out of the question meaning that CGI would be needed for the second head. Now, to have that Computer Animation in every shot of Zaphod would be hella expensive and "event" movies are no longer as big as they were. Plus, the director wanted to use as little CGI as possible so there would be more of a "Timeless" quality to the movies. Kinda like old Starwars vs. new Starwars.

So in the end, Zaphod got his second head under his first head.

But then again, what will happen if "Mostly Harmless" gets made? I guess that part would have to be changed because in that book, Tricia (or was it Trillian?) were talking about how she met Zaphod and had a fake bird cage on his shoulder with Zaphod's second head inside.
 

DisneyPhD

Well-Known Member
DarkMeasures said:
The reason Zaphod has his second head different is because of money. Because of the AA in the TV series always failed at working, that was left out of the question meaning that CGI would be needed for the second head. Now, to have that Computer Animation in every shot of Zaphod would be hella expensive and "event" movies are no longer as big as they were. Plus, the director wanted to use as little CGI as possible so there would be more of a "Timeless" quality to the movies. Kinda like old Starwars vs. new Starwars.

So in the end, Zaphod got his second head under his first head.

But then again, what will happen if "Mostly Harmless" gets made? I guess that part would have to be changed because in that book, Tricia (or was it Trillian?) were talking about how she met Zaphod and had a fake bird cage on his shoulder with Zaphod's second head inside.


:lol: :lol: I forgot about that. Yes the one in the BBC verson was BAD wasn't it? I don't know how to invison the "2nd head under the chin", so I will just have to wait and see.
 

Steamboat_Kevin

Well-Known Member
I liked the books a lot, and I've got high expectations for the movie because there are a lot of British people working on the film. One of the executive producers of the film, Robbie Stamp, was a good friend of Douglas Adams, and Douglas Adams's family have been closely involved with the production. There are, in other words, many eyes on this project with a personal interest in maintaining Douglas Adams's vision.


I'm not sure that people who don't know about the books, radio show, etc. will know this is a comedy by the TV spots they are showing. It looks more like a sci-fi action flick.
 

barnum42

New Member
Steamboat_Kevin said:
I'm not sure that people who don't know about the books, radio show, etc. will know this is a comedy by the TV spots they are showing. It looks more like a sci-fi action flick.
That is my worry from the official trailer - that it's been Americanised into an action flick rather than a comedy. The one review I have seen seems to indicate this to be the case. I still aim to see this flick though.
 

DisneyPhD

Well-Known Member
barnum42 said:
That is my worry from the official trailer - that it's been Americanised into an action flick rather than a comedy. The one review I have seen seems to indicate this to be the case. I still aim to see this flick though.


barnum, I always seem to agree with you!

Time will tell!
 

DarkMeasures

New Member
Well Comedy and Action fit in well with each other.

But hey. Douglas Adams is the one who wrote the script so anything that went wrong with the movie is his fault.
 

barnum42

New Member
DarkMeasures said:
But hey. Douglas Adams is the one who wrote the script so anything that went wrong with the movie is his fault.
Douglas died four years ago - plenty of time for the suits to totally up his original script.
 

ogryn

Well-Known Member
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/film/4461899.stm

Don't panic - The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is not as bad as I had feared. Then again, it is not as good as I had hoped.

Stuck in development hell for the best part of 26 years, Douglas Adams' book has finally reached the big screen - four years after the author's death.

Adams' deceptively complex novels are crammed full of witty erudition, great gags and lengthy digressions, so it was always going to be a struggle to turn it into a neatly packaged two-hour movie.

Understandably perhaps, huge swathes of the novel have been cut in order to make a consistent, story-led film.

At the same time, director Garth Jennings tries hard to retain the comedic essence that so defined Adams' originals.

Beguiling

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy centres on the hapless Arthur Dent, who awakes one morning to find his best friend is an alien, his planet is about to be destroyed and that he is somehow central to a galactic scientific experiment to determine the meaning of life itself.

What marked the book out as more than a mere comedic romp was the density of ideas that Adams managed to distil in the text - everything from handheld computing to existentialism to musings on cricket and maths.

Sam Rockwell does a great turn as Zaphod Beeblebrox, the two-headed president of the galaxy; Mos Def is passable as Ford Prefect; while Zooey Deschanel is beguiling as Trillian.

As the voice of Marvin the Paranoid Android, Alan Rickman perfectly conveys the character's world-weary disdain, despite being woefully underused.

A lot of effort has gone in to keeping the film as faithful to Adams' vision as possible. But somewhere in the production process the crew has lost sight of the fundamental aspect of the books - they were immensely funny.

Truncated

The film burbles along at an amusing canter, occasionally rising to levels worthy of a chuckle. But unlike the books and radio series, it rarely makes you laugh out loud.

Some of the original gags find their way into the film version, but they feel neutered or truncated.

Screenwriter Karey Kirkpatrick, who continued the adaptation work started by Adams, has had to make a number of sacrifices to get the text into cinematic form.

Unfortunately, one of the elements sacrificed is sense.

Hitchhiker fans will know what is happening, but newcomers will be left scratching their heads at a story that flits from one unpronounceable planet to another - each one populated by equally exotic-sounding characters.

Did I say characters? Hmmm. While Dent is a familiar cipher, audiences will be left clueless by Ford Prefect, bemused by Zaphod Beeblebrox and indifferent to Trillian.

Despite outstanding production design and some fantastic visual effects, overall the film is a bit of a mess. A charming mess, maybe, but a mess all the same.

Did the script veer too far away from the source material or tie itself in knots trying to keep faith with it?

Bizarrely, I think the answer is both.

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is out in the UK on 28 April.
 

catinthehat

New Member
Original Poster
Hmmm, that reviewer really didn't seem to know what to think - I wouldn't say he thought it was necessarily bad. I am still going to see it - there are more positive reviews than bad.
 

cindy_k

Well-Known Member
Its at times like this when I am stuck in a Vogon airlock with a man from Beetleguise about to die from asphyxiation in deep space that I really wish I had listened to what my mother told me when I was young.

I really really hope they kept lines like this in the movie.. or I am going to be very sad. :cry:
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom