Originally posted by Wilt Dasney
Or how about just acknowledging that both of them are endearingly rich fantasy epics from extremely fertile imaginations, one of them showcasing its world through complex, multilayered characters whose scope of experience is constantly expanding, and the other focusing on fictitious geography and history to show its thoroughness and depth?
Or to cut down on some wordiness here: They're different, but both really good. Crazy concept, I know.
Originally posted by Wilt Dasney
Or how about just acknowledging that both of them are endearingly rich fantasy epics from extremely fertile imaginations, one of them showcasing its world through complex, multilayered characters whose scope of experience is constantly expanding, and the other focusing on fictitious geography and history to show its thoroughness and depth?
Or to cut down on some wordiness here: They're different, but both really good. Crazy concept, I know.
Originally posted by FutureCEO
Ok, new club and im starting it.
ANTI-HARRY POTTER AND PRO-LORD OF THE RINGS.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.