I can't believe it ends like this. Who's to blame?
http://www.cartoonbrew.com/disney/b...heir-hand-drawn-animation-division-81043.html
http://www.cartoonbrew.com/disney/b...heir-hand-drawn-animation-division-81043.html
Us - the viewing public who stopped paying to see hand drawn cartoons.I can't believe it ends like this. Who's to blame?
http://www.cartoonbrew.com/disney/b...heir-hand-drawn-animation-division-81043.html
Exactly. Princess and the frog was an awesome film, one the best they have EVER done in my eyes. The public didn't go see it, so therefore why should they waste their time. The sad part is if PaTF was CG with the same everything else, I bet it would have tripled what it did.Us - the viewing public who stopped paying to see hand drawn cartoons.
Feature Animation in Florida was shut down years ago.So since they've now gutted the hand-drawn animation, does that mean the Art of Animation building and the animation character "classes" that they have at DHS are now going to get axed too? I thought it was neat to see the animators at work. I didn't like it so much that they were on display like animals at the zoo, but it was still neat to see them doing work with animation cells and such.
I don't really buy that reasoning. Disney still makes a lot of money off of old hand-drawn films, which suggests to me that the hand-drawn medium, in and of itself, is still viable. Traditionally animated shows, like Phineas and Ferb and SpongeBob, are still popular on television. The Lasseter-era hand-drawn films suffered from poor marketing more than anything else. This latest move by Disney just shows that they have no confidence in their creative product. Sad, very sad....I hope these talented artists find good jobs with another studio that will make good use of their skills.
Most hand drawn shows are actually made with the help if computers now. Phineas and Ferb is drawn with a stylus right on to the computer. Same with all the Fox shows. So are they getting rid of cell animation only? Or all "hand drawn"?
And why we'll never see another Sistine Chapel. We'd all rather sit on our butts these days, creating and consuming.This is news? Come on. They've been talking about this for years. Personally, I don't give a crap; I think that computer animation is cool and that Disney can make better computer animated movies than other companies COUGHdreamworksCOUGH. I think Tangled was better for having been in 3D. Times are changing. Let's move along.
As someone who's never been good at art, a 3D printer really sounds nice...I can't draw to save my life.And why we'll never see another Sistine Chapel. We'd all rather sit on our butts these days, creating and consuming.
Why hand carve something when you can just upload a model to a 3D printer, right? Ugh.
And I'm a computer person; have been for a long time!
Well yes, animators (of the traditional sort) sat on their butts a lot too. I was thinking more along the lines of painters, sculptors and other craftsmen.As someone who's never been good at art, a 3D printer really sounds nice...I can't draw to save my life.
Doesn't hand drawn animation involve sitting on your butt as well?
I think even for computer models they do some of that.Well yes, animators (of the traditional sort) sat on their butts a lot too. I was thinking more along the lines of painters, sculptors and other craftsmen.![]()
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.