Using Crump’s own words against him - he called this “evidence tampering.” Under Florida law (§918.13), that means altering, destroying, or concealing evidence that could be used in an official proceeding. If he really believed that’s what was happening, the logical move would be to file suit and ask for immediate relief - like having a judge order Universal to halt Stardust Racers until everything was preserved.
It’s not. People often then erroneously claim that it’s people rushing at the last minute to get a quick buck from the parks.
Refresh the page.
He'll just use discovery to flush out any and all changes UNI made to the ride post-accident. He never had a leg to stand-on to force the ride remained closed and they know that - that's the realm of the state. There was never a chance to try to preserve the scene in some way for their inspection. They clearly at their earlier PCs didn't even know what evidence UNI had - they presumed video recordings, etc based on reasonable assumptions.
You can’t force a business to shut down a ride like this just by filing a lawsuit.
And that’s exactly it. The state is already the custodian of the scene and the data. If Crump really believed Universal was destroying evidence, he’d have to back it up with more than a sound bite.
Trying to prevent this from happening again isn't an admission of guilt.
I have no idea what your response has to do with what you quoted.