donaldtoo
Well-Known Member
This whole thread needs a gummy or something…
Yea, it really needs to be retitled the “Guest dies, found unresponsive after riding Stardust Racers, wild or otherwise speculation thread”.
This whole thread needs a gummy or something…
I didn't say I found it distasteful to discuss safety measures. I find it distasteful to speculate on the 'body type' of the man who died and how it contributed to his death. I understand people are having a discussion based on little information and some speculation based on various scenarios will happen. However, this line of discussion is a little too close to jumping to dismiss the likelihood of issues with the ride itself because the guest who died had a disability, often involving pure speculation about his spinal issues.Why do you think it's distasteful to discuss safety measures? This whole thread is just speculation.
But the ride could be operating as intended and something occurred that had not been anticipated in the design or testing process. In other words, the ride operating as intended does not preclude there being some design flaw.Because he died from blunt force trauma and the press release saying that the ride was operating as intended, to me it presents what most likely happened. I am not here to disrespect anyone's disability.
I had a shot of bourbon and was told to not drink and post.
To say that is slander…I had a shot of bourbon and was told to not drink and post.
- Guests must be able to independently walk a short distance under their own power, including on stairs, in the event of an evacuation.
Clearly TMs didn't care about this... If they remembered to think about it at all.
"Body type" is simply another way of saying "different people are different". Just because it doesn't apply to YOU doesn't mean it doens't apply to ANYONE, etc. It's not a pick specifically about disability - it's saying DIFFERENT PEOPLE ARE DIFFERENT. Maybe his disability is a factor, maybe its not. But either way, all points current point to the accident being an intersection of him and the ride.I didn't say I found it distasteful to discuss safety measures. I find it distasteful to speculate on the 'body type' of the man who died and how it contributed to his death
It's the way the restraints are designed. Although from different companies, the way they work are exactly the same. Its why its the preferred restraint now days from most coaster companies that aren't B&M2 different coasters with 2 different trains with different seats on different tracks may not result in the same results. Not to mention we don't know exactly where he hit himself. I've heard some rumors about the back of the previous seat to me, it would make more sense if these were blows to the more fragile back/side of the head from his own seat.
Nonetheless, just because you can't actively reach a seat by yourself doesn't mean a body of deadweight unconcious can't as you are not longer dealing with your bodies pain and "too much" systems that tell you when you are overextending.
If this ride was dangerous for his body type, he should not have been allowed to ride so either the restraints didn't fit quite right or something else happened.
Either way I would definitely wait to see what the official investigation finds. This is a very very unfortunate tragedy and I do hope that the family gets some level of closure.
It's the way the restraints are designed. Although from different companies, the way they work are exactly the same. Its why its the preferred restraint now days from most coaster companies that aren't B&M
3 shots of bourbon here.I had a shot of bourbon and was told to not drink and post.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.