DisneyHead123
Well-Known Member
I just strongly am advocating that there is not yet clear sufficient evidence of impropriety, on anyone's behalf. I think there was an unfortunate consequence that was intrinsic but unknown to the guest against a very unfortunate perfect accidental storm.
I think a big factor will be if the blunt force trauma suffered would have been fatal to anyone, or only to a small subset of people (If for example, he was living with an aneurysm that was undiagnosed. I was shocked when I saw recently that something like 1 in 50 people walk around with un-ruptured aneurysms that they presumably know nothing about.)
If he suffered a head injury that would have been fatal to most people, it’s very hard for me to imagine what could be that unique about his anatomy that would make this unlikely to happen again. The most likely culprits would seem to be very low muscle tone when unconscious or a greater than average range of motion - not exactly extremely uncommon situations, especially as neurodivergence increases.