For every 7 positive opinions there's going to be 1 unnecessarily dramatic negative opinion.
I mean he has always been pessimistic in general when it comes to most topics so nothing is surprising about his opinions anymore. He never runs out of something to nitpick about.
I know I will love GotG when it opens in 5 or 6 years…..
It’s ridiculous that it takes Disney 5 years to build a roller coaster. Especially when part of the building already existed. Virus or not it was going to take 5 years.
That is no different than what you see on home improvement shows on HGTV where logos and artwork on the walls are blurred. Or grey/black stickers over computer logos on the lids of laptops. This is not some uniquely nefarious thing Disney is doing. If the image is of general construction materials they don’t want to (nor are they authorized to) unlawfully advertise a brand seemingly creating an endorsement of the brand. When it comes to thing like the attraction and ride system, it’s 100% normal for the contract to ban the manufacturer from watermarking images or video of work for hire with their logo since it’s not their product, it’s owned by the party that commissioned the work. Universal Creative does the exact same thing.
“Unlawful advertising” isn’t a thing. And Disney did endorse the product as it’s in the specifications for the project.
yeah don't think that term is a thing, but used to work for big big company. legal dept would be crazy with some of their asks when we released videos that had other brands in the background etc. less to do with us advertising them, and more to protect ourselves if that brand didn't want to be in the video/picture etc
It actually is, it just does not relate to the blurring of logos in video or still images.
www.howtogeek.com
It actually is, it just does not relate to the blurring of logos in video or still images.
The blurring of logos is typically more about trademark infringement. Now technically, displaying a company's logo in a TV show or movie is not illegal, but in a country where anyone can sue anyone for anything, most people err on the side of caution and either blur out logos or make up fake companies. (eg Pear Computers)
Why Do TV Shows and Movies Cover Up Logos?
Have you ever wondered why some TV shows go to great lengths to obscure logos on laptops and other well-known products? The reasons are seemingly simple, but not necessarily clear cut.
Selecting a material, if indeed the contract specified a brand vs just a specification is not automatically an endorsement of that product.
That article straight up says it’s not illegal. Slapping the Coca-Cola logo onto something could get you into trouble but someone just using the product isn’t an issue.It actually is, it just does not relate to the blurring of logos in video or still images.
The blurring of logos is typically more about trademark infringement. Now technically, displaying a company's logo in a TV show or movie is not illegal, but in a country where anyone can sue anyone for anything, most people err on the side of caution and either blur out logos or make up fake companies. (eg Pear Computers)
Why Do TV Shows and Movies Cover Up Logos?
Have you ever wondered why some TV shows go to great lengths to obscure logos on laptops and other well-known products? The reasons are seemingly simple, but not necessarily clear cut.
Vendors sign contracts that limit their advertising. Different vendors are able to pull different deals. Vekoma has been able to push for more and even got Disney to openly acknowledge their involvement in this project.
Large companies like Disney maintain their own master specifications so that they can control the companies. Disney maintains their own list of approved vendors for products and will even directly purchase many building materials usually purchased by the contractor themselves. Disney also doesn’t seemed concerned about the thousands who see the logo right there at the park.
Not much Mummy at all. Seems to be a Gringotts that doesn’t stop.
That is recent as Disney does not have to shell out as much money as they would pay more to block their specific promotional efforts to other companies at tradeshows and the like.
I stated exactly that.It actually is, it just does not relate to the blurring of logos in video or still images.
The blurring of logos is typically more about trademark infringement. Now technically, displaying a company's logo in a TV show or movie is not illegal, but in a country where anyone can sue anyone for anything, most people err on the side of caution and either blur out logos or make up fake companies. (eg Pear Computers)
Why Do TV Shows and Movies Cover Up Logos?
Have you ever wondered why some TV shows go to great lengths to obscure logos on laptops and other well-known products? The reasons are seemingly simple, but not necessarily clear cut.
