Mainahman
Well-Known Member
Is at the heart....of inspiration...........
Is at the heart....of inspiration...........
...of all creation...Is at the heart....
for god’s sake stop this here and now...of all creation...
Why do we need a classification other than "thrill ride"? We've gotten to the point where the attractions that Disney/Universal adds blur the lines so much between what most would consider "traditional classifications" that they really are just attractions of a classification of their own. Would you consider Escape from Gringots a roller coaster? I mean, it certainly has roller coaster elements, but it also has dark ride elements and simulator elements.
Ellen was given the animatronic's skin and costume
WDW claims they did not send anything to Ellen. This was just a gag created by her show.Were they actually able to recover the original skin mold? The site-that-shall-not-be-named claims the actual AA was destroyed after its removal, so its amazing if Imagineering still had that part of it.
It's a dumb detail, but the shirts aren't the same. The one in the studio has one pocket while the Ellen AA ride picture has two pockets. Actually, the collar looks off too. I'm going to go with this was a prank and not actually the AA skin.WDW claims they did not send anything to Ellen. This was just a gag created by her show.
In other words, for no good reason lol
For me, Horizons, WoM and Figment were all extremely painful to see close. But at least the other 2 changed into something drastically different with a reasons that while I didn't agree with, still made sense since the attraction types also changed. Figment's change was so unnecessary and pointless. Even more so looking back on it all now. Plus, of those three, it was the most timeless. The '82 version could have easily still existed today with minimal or even no changes or updates at all. Honestly, even WoM could have remained almost the same today and still be seen as being timeless.
It wouldn't have made sense anyway, we all know that the AA has been long gone since 2014.WDW claims they did not send anything to Ellen. This was just a gag created by her show.
Didn’t I first break that during a random trip report? I remember it started with just the Elasmosaurus.It wouldn't have made sense anyway, we all know that the AA has been long gone since 2014.
Ellen was given the animatronic's skin and costume
That looks as bad as Ripley's constirpated face pre-maintenance on the great movie ride.To be fair to Disney, the mask isn't applied right to that mannequin.
To be fair to reality, it always was awful.
It's a dumb detail, but the shirts aren't the same. The one in the studio has one pocket while the Ellen AA ride picture has two pockets. Actually, the collar looks off too. I'm going to go with this was a prank and not actually the AA skin.
The closest voice actor that I can think off the top of my head that is as close as we can get to almost matching Billy's Figment voice would have to be Charlie Adler.Yeah, he really was. His voice was perfect for Figment. It was the perfect blend of a silly, whimsical voice that had a child-like innocence mixed with a slight devilish side that deep down was a sweet prankster at heart. I don't want to knock the current guy who does Figment (he's Gonzo, too), but Billy Barty will always be Figment. RIP Billy.
This might be slightly off topic, but it looks like we may be getting the music from EEA in full quality.
The closest voice actor that I can think off the top of my head that is as close as we can get to almost matching Billy's Figment voice would have to be Charlie Adler.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.