V_L_Raptor
Well-Known Member
A quick thought: saw a previous post comparing Guardians and Avatar to Peter Pan and Alice in terms of "properties with a single film that have stood the test of time"...I'm not really sure how we can say that.
Alice and Pan have roots that go much further back, both in the larger cultural/literary mileau and more specifically in the history of Disney as a company. Also, neither is expected to prop up an entire area themed only around itself.
While Guardians could prove to have some staying power, I'm hard pressed to see where Avatar does. Yes, it was a blockbuster during its theatrical run, but since then has not really had a notable place in pop cultural consciousness; no quotes everybody knows, no diehard fanbase, etc. Cameron may want to make numerous sequels, and maybe they'll be good, but there certainly isn't any high public demand for them.
This does not disqualify Avatar Land from being good, of course, but the comparison doesn't feel apples to apples.
About the only major staying power I can think of for Avatar is as a running gag in Universal's Bill and Ted HHN sketch. Other than that, it's a monument to Cameron's vanity.