Polydweller
Well-Known Member
Not necessarily true. Disney is as bound by the terms of the contract (and contract law) as much as the vendor is. If the terms allow the vendor to adjust the business operations for contracted reasons then they can adjust within the contract language.Nothing happens without TDO's approval, If TDO wanted them the contractor would have been told to "embrace the suck" if you want the Bay Lake business.
Most third party contracts I've been involved with (and there are many in the hotel business) have escape clauses so that a vendor will not be trapped in non-profitable and non-viable operations. It doesn't help a business if their vendors go broke. There are of course escape clauses for the company that hires the vendor. In this case, from what's being reported, the low usage of the boats and resultant low profitability was an acceptable reason contractually.