D.Silentu
Well-Known Member
A little more pepper for the pot, but I think that I am the target audience and yet the Starcruiser doesn't really appeal to me either. Last fall I paid just above one hundred dollars for an hour long interactive theatre experience. I realize that will sound exorbitant to some, but to me it was an exciting sixty minutes of escapism. Evaluating my experiences with this medium, I'm shocked by how much I have seen is possible in contrast to what Disney has done here. A few examples: Actors jumping off a two story structure, characters flying and levitating, swinging on a rope Indiana Jones style, being pulled through a trapdoor. I could go on, but the point is there is so much that has been done, but that groundwork seems lost on Disney. Raven24, some pages ago you described the Disney experience as treating it's guests like children. I think that assessment goes a long way to illustrate part of the Starcruiser's off putting approach, for me at least.I think that those of us who have been stating that that the experience isn't for us have a pretty clear understanding that we are not the target audience.
This is one of the most disappointing aspects of the hotel, largely since they have been boasting about it since the announcement. Correct me if I'm off base, but this seems to be the equivalent to Universal's magic wands that they cooked up. I think the results speak for themselves. There are far better ways to have implemented this, but chiefly it once again it looks like they are poorly portraying the notion that guests are undertaking a genuinely unique experience.As Example #48 of the cheapness, this is "Lightsaber Training". It's basically a flashlight shining out of a hole in the wall in a dramatically lit room, with audio effects from a surround sound system.