Also, I'm gonna say right off the bat that we only do brand new rides for Fantasyland. No clones. Anyone agree?
A bit.
I mean we could use the new Mermaid attraction, but I don't see the point of using Peter Pan, Snow White for the eigth time in Disney park history.
Don't remove Peter Pan, re-imagine it.
We could use:
-Little Mermaid
The same as the new DCA/MK ride, no, different ride, yes.
-Robin Hood Ride from Imagineer 2
No.
-Sword in the Stone Ride from Imagineer 2
Perhaps.
-Princess and the Frog Ride
Yes.
-Mary Poppins ride
Ride? No. Show? Yes.
-New it's a small world
Obligatory?
-Fantasia 3D show?
Yes.
-Hercules Ride?
Depends.
-Hunchback ride?
No.
-Fairies 3D show?
NEVER.
-Mulan ride?
Yes!
-Maybe an Ichabod ride
But of course.
-I think we could do a Black Cauldron thrill ride (a mountain)
Gawd, yes.
-Cinderella, Belle, or Aurora ride (depends on the castle choice, or all 3 if we do original castle)
Sure.
-Possibly Dumbo, Carousel and Mad Tea Party...
No Dumbo = Not a Disney Park.
What about a Shadowlands mini area with rides based off villains?
Mini area, no.
We could divide Fantasyland into lots of different countries so have England (Robin Hood, Mary Poppins, Sword in the Stone, Pooh, Peter Pan), France (Hunchback, Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty, Beauty & the Beast), German (Snow White), Denmark (The Little Mermaid), Italy (Pinocchio), Greece (Hercules), and possibly even New Orleans for Princess & The Frog.
We could divide Fantasyland into lots of different countries so have England (Robin Hood, Mary Poppins, Sword in the Stone, Pooh, Peter Pan), France (Hunchback, Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty, Beauty & the Beast), German (Snow White), Denmark (The Little Mermaid), Italy (Pinocchio), Greece (Hercules), and possibly even New Orleans for Princess & The Frog.
I wonder... but will it end up less whimsical this way, it may mean the architecture is a it limited?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.