There would be riots in the streets, and by streets I mean those fake streets we have on the internet.Can you imagine the outcry if there were suddenly only 3-4 entree's per TS (and possibly QS, but not as likely) restaurant that were DDP-eligible? And they weren't the highest priced items on a given menu??
I think the actually did this in the beginning. I seem to remember certain items carrying a surcharge if you used the DDP.Except that's how it should have been all along. Not everything is a snack credit, why should all of the entrees be included? Have a small upcharge for the highest priced menu items, and the restaurant can keep the quality level.
That was mine and Mrs Ferrets recollection of looking at menus back in the day.I think the actually did this in the beginning. I seem to remember certain items carrying a surcharge if you used the DDP.
I would love to agree with you, but a conversation I have with the owner of La Hacienda when it first opened said exactly the opposite. He stated that the DDP absolutely dictates what they can and can not put on a menu. He stated that you simply cant put something like a fillet on the menu unless you go signature. That leaves you with sirloin or very cheep NY strip.According to estimates out there, only about 1/3 of visitors to the theme parks actually stay on property at Disney resorts. Of those staying on property, a good percentage also choose not to purchase the dining plan. When 2/3 of your guests aren't even eligible for the dining plan, and of the remaining 1/3 a good chunk don't buy the dining plan.... well, I think the effect of the dining plan on restaurants is being overstated in this thread, to say the least.
I had that same conversation with a few managers as well, and they told me the same thing. I actually don't mind that Le Cellier went signature, because since it is 2 credits, it's a lot easier to get a reservation now! I think more places should go that route.I would love to agree with you, but a conversation I have with the owner of La Hacienda when it first opened said exactly the opposite. He stated that the DDP absolutely dictates what they can and can not put on a menu. He stated that you simply cant put something like a fillet on the menu unless you go signature. That leaves you with sirloin or very cheep NY strip.
Regardless if 75%, 50% or only 20% of the guests use it, it is enough to control what restaurants can and ca not do if they want to stay in the black.
This is not correct, but I've argued the point before and nobody believed me and I have no interest in getting into it.I'd encourage you to poke around these threads from previous years. The impact of the DDP on table service restaurants is well documented.
To put it simply, the DDP gives the restaurant "x" per person. Regardless of what they order. This has had a two pronged effect.
1. Cash prices have risen to offset the DDP allowances.
2. Restaurants have had to pull certain menu items because they were losing money on them thanks to the proliferation of the DDP.
Those aren't opinions, they are facts. Reported by CMs and GMs in food and bev.
I would love to agree with you, but a conversation I have with the owner of La Hacienda when it first opened said exactly the opposite. He stated that the DDP absolutely dictates what they can and can not put on a menu. He stated that you simply cant put something like a fillet on the menu unless you go signature. That leaves you with sirloin or very cheep NY strip.
Regardless if 75%, 50% or only 20% of the guests use it, it is enough to control what restaurants can and ca not do if they want to stay in the black.
You guys are mixing two different things. Disney owned-and-operated restaurants are different than third party owned restaurants that also happen to be on the dining plan.I had that same conversation with a few managers as well, and they told me the same thing. I actually don't mind that Le Cellier went signature, because since it is 2 credits, it's a lot easier to get a reservation now! I think more places should go that route.
How so other than possibly better purchasing options due to volume that Disney owned restaurants might get?You guys are mixing two different things. Disney owned-and-operated restaurants are different than third party owned restaurants that also happen to be on the dining plan.
This is not correct, but I've argued the point before and nobody believed me and I have no interest in getting into it.
Just use a common-sense example. If things worked the way you described, restaurants would literally get ZERO revenue during free dining, since that's the "value" of a dining credit. There's no price increase in the world that could cover ZERO revenue. Restaurants get the menu price of the items ordered. The difference is marketing / promotion expense.
If Disney offered some sort of plan where for X amount of quick service meals you prepaid for, you got one free (for example), I'd totally be on board for that. We would be buying more on site food than normal but there would still be some financial benefit for us.
They did recently trial a same-day (buy at the gate or guest services) Magic Kingdom dining plan, where for $29 you got two quick service meals (lunch and dinner). But the potential saving is only around 20%, or pretty much free soda with your entree/combo.
see https://disneyparks.disney.go.com/b...gic-kingdom-park-at-walt-disney-world-resort/
Still, 20% isnt a bad deal, especially when you start talking about groups of 4 or 5.
Does anyone feel like there is real value in "free" dining since they basically jack up the cost of the room? To me it feels like they are just shifting costs from food to the room.
You have to do the math to see if it's worth it. Four adults in one room, if you were going to buy your tickets with hoppers as a package anyway -- and assuming you will use all the dining and snack credits -- likely worth it.Does anyone feel like there is real value in "free" dining since they basically jack up the cost of the room? To me it feels like they are just shifting costs from food to the room.
I have been told by more than one manager that they are paid a set amount for people on the dining plan - not what the menu price is.Here's the big question, and I am seeing conflicting information:
When a customer visits a Disney owned-and-operated restaurant and uses a dining plan credit, does the restaurant get paid the menu price of the item or do they get paid a fixed amount per credit that does not change regardless of what the customer orders?
The answer to that, to my mind, would determine who is right in their arguments about what impact the dining plan has.
Here's the big question, and I am seeing conflicting information:
When a customer visits a Disney owned-and-operated restaurant and uses a dining plan credit, does the restaurant get paid the menu price of the item or do they get paid a fixed amount per credit that does not change regardless of what the customer orders?
The answer to that, to my mind, would determine who is right in their arguments about what impact the dining plan has.
I have been told the same. A TS credit gets them X regardless of what it is. The same is true for a QS and snack credit.I have been told by more than one manager that they are paid a set amount for people on the dining plan - not what the menu price is.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.