Fixing DAK without Avatar

[MA Screamin']

I loved the Beastly Kingdome concept, but with Potterland around, I always felt that it would seem like the more obvious combat move by Disney. And personally, some of those elements should have been included in FLE (this is the only reason it doesn't sit right with me that Dumbo, tho beautiful, extends out to the north where there should have been a junction to use the land behind the service rode and fle for dragon tower and fantasia gardens)

Back to the point, if it must be built, the Austrailia plot is hugesp you could use half and have a big austrailia and the other half for bk

You're right, it definetly would be a good move (and the half 'n half is perfect). I was thinking of putting Avatar in to a new idea for Beastly Kingdomd, maybe a mini-land, so people who don't want it don't get as much as it. (Soarin' over Pandora, anyone? Just kidding...)

 

[Omegadiz]

You're right, it definetly would be a good move (and the half 'n half is perfect). I was thinking of putting Avatar in to a new idea for Beastly Kingdomd, maybe a mini-land, so people who don't want it don't get as much as it. (Soarin' over Pandora, anyone? Just kidding...)

uh, well that wasnt what i meant. I was saying, althoug i loved the original concept, i dont think it should come to fruition due to it being obvious to guest as a potter-wacker and some of those elements should make a home in Fantasyland or a new land north-east of RoA.

Of course, i wouldnt mind beastly kingdome in AK only if it came after America's, Arctic, Austrailia, and The Land of the Extict. As for Avatar, it doesnt bother me except for the fact that the park isnt built out by itself already. I think Disney should have went with the ideas above and used it's own library, and THEN consider putting Avatar in after. Iger got on my bad side with that one. Sorry, had to rant a little