Five Orphans From Home Makeover Show Sue

bsandersjr

Active Member
Original Poster
Five Orphans From Home Makeover Show Sue
Friday August 12 8:53 AM ET


Five orphaned siblings who moved into a new dream home on the hit ABC television show "Extreme Makeover: Home Edition" are suing the network, the company that built the house and the couple who took them in after their parents died.

The children range in age from 15 to 22. They claim that after "Extreme Makeover" built a new nine-bedroom mansion for them to live in with Phil and Loki Leomiti, the Leomitis engaged in "an orchestrated campaign" to drive them away by insulting them and treating them poorly.

The children ultimately moved out of the Leomitis' home in Santa Fe Springs, a small city southeast of Los Angeles, and are living separately with friends, said Charles Higgins II, the eldest sibling.


Their complaint, which was filed Wednesday, alleges fraud and breach of contract. It seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.

"What we're really seeing is the collision between reality TV and the perception reality TV seeks to create in the minds of the general public," said their lawyer, Patrick Mesisca.

ABC said in a statement that "It is important to note that the episode was about the rebuilding of the Leomiti family's existing home to accommodate the inclusion of the five Higgins siblings, whom the Leomitis had invited into their lives following the death of their parents."

People who answered the phone at the Leomitis' home initially said the couple had no comment and later referred questions to ABC and to Endemol USA, the television show's production company. Endemol publicist Melissa Armstrong said the company had not yet reviewed the claim.

The parents of the Higgins children died 10 weeks apart in the spring of 2004 the mother of breast cancer and the father of heart failure. The Leomitis, who knew the children from church, opened their home to them in July 2004, according to the lawsuit.

Producers of "Extreme Makeover" learned of the children's plight from a television newscast.

Workers demolished the Leomitis' house in February and then built the new one. "Extreme Makeover" producers arranged for the siblings to receive cars, groceries, computers, stereos and other gifts.

The builder, Pardee Homes, paid off the mortgage on the new house but the Leomitis retained the title, according to the lawsuit. Around the time the episode first aired in late March, the siblings moved out.

Mesisca, the attorney, acknowledged Wednesday that the siblings were never promised a house in writing. But the network's statements and actions could legally be considered a promise, he said.

"We were promised a home," said Charles Higgins II. "They broke that promise."



I got this from www.yahoo.com
 

hcswingfield

Active Member
Not a fan of this show. I tried to watch it a couple of times, and it turned my stomach. Ty's incessant yelling, the fake tears from the other workers, the fact that they think just because someone has had some hard luck they "deserve" the biggest mansion in the tri-state area, loaded with lots of appliances that nobody really needs, but that are sold at Sears so it make for a good 60 minute infomercial. I'm not usually cynical, but I know lots of people who need better housing, and "deserve" it just as much as anyone on this show. Five or six families could get decent housing for what they blow on luxuries for the families they select. So it doesn't surprise me to find out that at least one "deserving" family was really motivated by greed and took the show for a major ride.
 

bsandersjr

Active Member
Original Poster
Yeah, I agree, but if you look past the 60-min. sear commercial, and the idiot cast, some of the families really need it. Some of them may not need it as much as others, but what can you do?
Honestly, I like ot watch it to catch glimpses of WDW. :lol:
 

hcswingfield

Active Member
bsandersjr said:
Yeah, I agree, but if you look past the 60-min. sear commercial, and the idiot cast, some of the families really need it. Some of them may not need it as much as others, but what can you do?
Honestly, I like ot watch it to catch glimpses of WDW. :lol:

Agreed, the glimpses of WDW are fun. And some of the families do need help, but not the excessive mansions that get built for them. I guess I spent too much time volunteering at non-profit charities. I get upset when I know there are many needy people who go without because a few get much more than they need. I was on a local Ryan White funding committee once and was horrified that adults needing money for life saving drugs were not funded, but over $2,000 was allocated for a birthday party for one baby with HIV. It just ain't right. Volunteers could have given the birthday party for free. People die without drugs, but you can live without a birthday party. When people are homeless, we shouldn't be building million dollar mansions for one family just because somebody's father died. sorry about the soapbox, but this is a big issue for me.
 

Fantasmic!329

Active Member
SpongeScott said:
Anyone know when this show aired?
I watched this particular episode about two or three weeks ago.

I do not often watch the show, but did watch it when this episode was re-run. I felt bad for them, but the whole situation seemed a bit weird. It was kind of dumb to do the whole thing, because (as it did happen) who knows how long the orphaned kids were going to stay there.
 

wannab@dis

Well-Known Member
SpongeScott said:
Anyone know when this show aired?
According to the article, it aired in late March. I remember seeing it, but I don't know if I watched the whole episode.
hcswingfield said:
Not a fan of this show. I tried to watch it a couple of times, and it turned my stomach. Ty's incessant yelling, the fake tears from the other workers, the fact that they think just because someone has had some hard luck they "deserve" the biggest mansion in the tri-state area, loaded with lots of appliances that nobody really needs, but that are sold at Sears so it make for a good 60 minute infomercial. I'm not usually cynical, but I know lots of people who need better housing, and "deserve" it just as much as anyone on this show. Five or six families could get decent housing for what they blow on luxuries for the families they select. So it doesn't surprise me to find out that at least one "deserving" family was really motivated by greed and took the show for a major ride.

I don't have a problem with the show. They are doing something good for people and it makes good television. You really don't think they are doing this just to be nice do you?

The home was built for the folks that were nice enough to bring in those kids. I don't know what's going on, but I'm sure the kids think they should get some money and figure this is the easiest way to get it. It's a shame that a good deed doesn't go unpunished anymore. :rolleyes:
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom