Fire in Tomorrowland

tissandtully

Well-Known Member
Not me! I like the attraction. Not my favorite, but, I find it funny.:D You guys are on your own when the investigation comes around. Make sure you all have alibi's.;)

Unless you don't consider a skunk having a body. I much prefer a burp, but neither one is that bad. It's more of the ability to magnify every emotion to make it awful. It's all done in fun. But what should we expect from a society that is so wrapped up in germ avoidance as this one.:eek:


Yeah, I don't find Stitch as awful as some of the nostalgic attractions at WDW. I really like the laser cannons or whatever they are called, remind me of something from Portal.
 

DJMoore2011

Well-Known Member
It wasn't a supposed great ride, it was a great ride, an original ride and in terms of thrills top notch seriously I flipped when I went on it as a kid. Stitch is a great movie the ride leaves wayyy to much to be desired its why the wait times are never more than 20 minutes and even then that means walk on.

And that is yours and others opinion of what the old ride was. Having never see it, or knew that anything was ever there before Stitch I can't agree with that opinion. For us we think Stitch is a good ride and will go again when we go back. It made my Special Need's Daughter laugh, gave Dear Hubby and I a chance to sit in AC so it was a win win for all.

And if the old ride was as scary as some say, I would have never gone on it because I don't do scary rides. That is my opinion and my choice.
 

AndyS2992

Well-Known Member
As much as I dislike Stitch, I wouldn't want it to burn since it would just be yet another empty building left to rot and not be replaced by anything and Disney would still raise prices despite having less to offer.
 

Sped2424

Well-Known Member
And that is yours and others opinion of what the old ride was. Having never see it, or knew that anything was ever there before Stitch I can't agree with that opinion. For us we think Stitch is a good ride and will go again when we go back. It made my Special Need's Daughter laugh, gave Dear Hubby and I a chance to sit in AC so it was a win win for all.

And if the old ride was as scary as some say, I would have never gone on it because I don't do scary rides. That is my opinion and my choice.

I was just telling you that the ride that was there was great as you said supposedly. More than enough people felt the same way, Im not saying you cant enjoy that ride it was just me explaining why so many people take issue with it.
 

NoChesterHester

Well-Known Member
As much as I dislike Stitch, I wouldn't want it to burn since it would just be yet another empty building left to rot and not be replaced by anything and Disney would still raise prices despite having less to offer.


In this case the Magic Kingdom would actually be better with a burned vacant building than that attraction. I can't say that for any other experience in the MK.
 

bigeternity

Active Member
I think it's contractually impossible & furthers the downward spiral & descent into the commercialization of Tomorrowland with unoriginal ideas from outside the parks.

That being said, skippy lives.

I do miss the original attraction ideas that WDI was encouraged to develop and build. Sigh.
 

Bairstow

Well-Known Member
As much as I dislike Stitch, I wouldn't trade it to bring back the old Mission to Mars.
That thing bored me to death, even as a kid.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom