DinoInstitute
Well-Known Member
I think this is great! Honestly, and I rarely say this, but I really don't think I would have done anything differently! The ride sounds great, well done!
2) They DO budget properly.
1) It was my pleasure to correct for you.
2) They DO budget properly.
$100 million on a clone of a glorified C-ticket dark ride, while a game-changing E-ticket at Uni cost $90 million (FJ) - I know the FJ show building is visible, but I'd rather have a great ride experience than a pretty exterior. \
Substance over style is always king
While I'd like them to finish the side of the building in a HP Phase 3, it's not a big deal to me since the Hogwarts queue and ride itself are phenomenal.Show building showing is bad show. (Wow. I abused that word.) However, that doesn't change the fact that Universal is doing more with less.
I feel like I've seen this before...was it in designing a new MK and epcot for you?
But thats not to say it wasnt a good idea, its pretty cool and I almost completely agree
Agreed. Philharmagic should stay where it s.I thought so.
I think the land seperation is a good idea, infact I've always wanted it that way---since I recently found out it actually was not its own land.
Mickey's Philharmagic, I think it should stay. Its a nice, different touch to Fantasyland, a great show IMO, and is a nice relaxation/something for everyone to enjoy.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.