Finding Nemo sequel: Finding Dory

lego606

MagicBandit
Nope. Nobody gets lost in this one. They are all together (it indicates they GO to the California Coast) to re-unite her with her family. FINDING Dory as in internally finding her past, not physically. :)

Oh i know nobody got lost. But somehow they all managed to swim from Australia to California
 

Turtle

Well-Known Member
As much as I love Finding Nemo, I'd much rather see Pixar spending their money on new films and not sequels.

Edit: Sans Toy Story. IMO, they get even better with each one.
Pixar has no sequels after Monsters University and Finding Dory. Search up The Good Dinosaur, Untitled Mind Film, and Untitled Dia De Los Muertos Film.


EXACT OPPOSITE FEELING NO MORE TOY STORY
 

openendedsky

Well-Known Member
What am I forgetting about cars 2? It was a bad film they can't be critically amazing for too much time. Every studio/director has a flop movie.
I'm just saying that I'm pretty meh/indifferent to sequels because a lot of the time they don't come out well. Toy Story was my exception.
 

Cosmic Commando

Well-Known Member
PLANES IS NOT A PIXAR MOVIE. PLANES IS NOT A PIXAR MOVIE. PLANES IS NOT A PIXAR MOVIE. PLANE IS BEING MADE BY DISNEY TOON STUDIOS, THE STUDIO BEHIND DISNEY CHEAP-QUELS AND RIP-OFF SPINOFFS.
Don't waste your time trying to convince people that Planes isn't a Pixar movie... a lot of people on the boards here will mention STITCH when they complain about the Pixar invasion of the parks. "Pixar" is just code for "I don't like it" for them.
 

lego606

MagicBandit
Don't waste your time trying to convince people that Planes isn't a Pixar movie... a lot of people on the boards here will mention STITCH when they complain about the Pixar invasion of the parks. "Pixar" is just code for "I don't like it" for them.
THEY NEED TO GET THAT PIXAR CHARACTER MICKEY MOUSE OUT OF THE PARKS
 

StarWarsGirl

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
Hopefully you'll soon learn published inflation numbers are taken by reviewing a SAMPLE of products and services in the country and represent a statistical average of costs - it's not just the cost of products sold. As such, it's not an absolute when you apply to an individual market, which may be moving at its own pace for various reasons (component prices, market shifts, new competition, etc).

Don't take national inflation numbers as some absolute that you apply blindly. I find it funny you discount an organization that specializes in the industry and historical tracking of the metrics in it.. in favor of a pure statistical average for the entire country.. calculated by a website by some random dude.

We all took ECON in college.. another one of those general studies classes us engineering majors looked forward to because it wasn't a meat grinder like our real course work.

Yes.. which is ironic then why you prefer random-web-dude over boxofficemojo..
You didn't read my earlier post when I explained inflation in depth and explained that it's general. Because there are so many firms selling tickets at different prices, you have to use the national numbers once every few years. It does not make sense to take them into account inflation numbers every year in this particular industry. They're not all going to adjust with the national rate. Given that tickets in my area have cost the same ever since I've been paying for them, which is about 3 years, I don't see the need to adjust for inflation.

Economics is part of my business degree program. I'm not a science or a math wiz and yet I'm doing better in the class than the science and math people.

Also, I'm taking it in high school. And my father was an economics major, so I consult him on a regular basis. Yes, he verified my facts.

Sorry it took so long to reply. I don't usually take this long, but when you replied, I was sick with 102 degree fever and thought, "Nope. Not arguing economics tonight." Then I forgot about it. Sorry.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom