Oh I read it.
Here’s link for anyone who’d like to check it out.
I understand that some governments use facial recognition to find and arrest dissidents. As we’ve mentioned, the technology isn’t perfect. But the article you shared repeatedly equated FRT with “tracking.” These are not necessarily the same thing. For example, this quote:
“If the government can track everyone who goes to a place of worship, attends a political rally, or seeks healthcare for reproductive health or substance use, we lose our freedom to speak our minds, freely criticize the government, pray to the god we want, and access healthcare in private.”
The government knows where I go to church whether they use facial recognition or not. But they’re not the only ones—Ford, Apple, PayPal, Visa, and my bank my local law enforcement, Facebook, Twitter, and the Bible App developers all know when and where I go to church. This does not limit my freedom in any way.
The article also mentioned that law enforcement “turning to FRT” to identify participants in the Capitol riots earlier this year. But the FBI does not rely SOLELY on FRT to identify suspects. They also use people, who look with their eyes to determine who might have been at the scene.
I completely agree that this technology (and pretty much all technology) can be used by a government against citizens to limit their freedom in some way (where’s the freedomhouse.org letter to Congress about
remotely disabling my car?). But in my opinion, Disney taking your picture when you enter their parks is nowhere near that slippery slope.