peter11435 said:I keep getting page not found for todays photos. Whats up?
Yeah when I click on the images, to see the large versions I get the wdwmagic page can't be found screen.wdwmagic said:
Maybe they are not finished.Laufschneller65 said:your pics are awsome. But just one statement.
~Why do the "Stanby entrance" and "Fast Pass" signs not fit in with the theme. I mean they are just white boards that stick out like a soar thumb. Urgh. why would the imagineers do so much work and put so much detail into this ride just to rruin the effect with two signs they could easily theme to the surroundings.
sry I'm a little about the themeing.
Laufschneller65 said:your pics are awsome. But just one statement.
~Why do the "Stanby entrance" and "Fast Pass" signs not fit in with the theme. I mean they are just white boards that stick out like a soar thumb. Urgh. why would the imagineers do so much work and put so much detail into this ride just to rruin the effect with two signs they could easily theme to the surroundings.
sry I'm a little about the themeing.
Good Point.wdwmagic said:There always has to be a trade off between visual authenticity, and plain ole functionality for operational reasons. As has been seen recently around the Splash Mountain area, people have problems reading heavily themed signs, they assume its part of the story, and doesnt need to be read. This then results in people getting lost or heading into the wrong line. It's a fine balance, but ultimately the attraction has to be operationally efficient.
Connor002 said:wow, thoes are some amazing pictures
it looks even biger than before
i wonder how tall it actually is?
has any information liek that been leaked/released yet?
i wonder what the top speed is?
the theming is great, despite the signs, but it kindof fits in, if you look closely it appears to be made of wooden planks, or is it just me?
does anyone know the layout yet?
i'm really looking foward to this one, but i can't help the fact that it looks very intimadating
The top peak is 199 feet tall.
Connor002 said:i had a feeling about the height
at 200 they need to put an avation warning light, right?
http://forums.wdwmagic.com/showthread.php?threadid=60224CTXRover said:One of these threads has a nice fan-made schematic of the track layout. Not sure which one though.
The rear of the show building is well over 100 feet. They will not be able to block that with foliage. They will most likely make no attempt to hide the backside of the mountain as it is not visible from within the park.Connor002 said:how will the show building be hidden, i know it wouldn't be visible from the paths, but i remember having very clear views of the entire construction site from blizzard beach.
i know that the imagineers have probally thought of everything, and i can thing of a few ways to hide its as well, but will the be relying on foilage alone?
Actually very cool, I wonder just how acurate this is.... I like the backward motion, I hate drops but I will just have to suckit up and give it a go!!Huge Dreamer said:
It's actually very accurate in layout except there are two helixes in the back. The only other flaw is its speed and timing. But other than that it is perfect.bhickman said:Actually very cool, I wonder just how acurate this is.... I like the backward motion, I hate drops but I will just have to suckit up and give it a go!!
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.