Magenta Panther
Well-Known Member
Another way to get families down to Disney Springs
Which is just a glorified shopping mall, right? I wouldn't waste five minutes on that.
Another way to get families down to Disney Springs
Which is just a glorified shopping mall, right? I wouldn't waste five minutes on that.
Will the Osborne Christmas lights end up down there?That's not entirely fair, as there's a lot of live entertainment down there, especially around the holidays.
No one knows.Will the Osborne Christmas lights end up down there?
Just saw Universal lawyers heading into DDThis would be an awesome store. I am looking forward to it.
I was thinking the same thing. Kind of like when Letterman went to CBS and NBC said he couldn't do the Light Night on a different network. Letterman really pushed the limits and basically did the same show - just changed a few things a little bit. They did the monorail loop past the Magic Kingdom and got away with it.of course it cant be named 'Marvel'... so maybe Superheroes r us? this seems like maybe disney pushing to see how far they can stretch the legal jargon (dunno how they can stretch the term 50 miles, or cannot use the name Marvel on it's East-of-the-mighty-Mississippi parks)
That probably depends on how far Marvel developed the Marvel Action Universe and how much Universal knowns about those concepts.My one question: is the store big enough that it could feature a M&G? I think conceivably they could have a M&G in DTD without violating the contract with Uni. That would allow them to promote the latest Marvel film at WDW even if it can't be done in the parks.
I don't know about all of that, especially since Disney owns Marvel.Just saw Universal lawyers heading into DD
They absolutely can and will use the name "Marvel." There's nothing legally ambiguous here. The east of the Mississippi rule applies to THEME PARKS, of which Downtown Disney is not one.of course it cant be named 'Marvel'... so maybe Superheroes r us? this seems like maybe disney pushing to see how far they can stretch the legal jargon (dunno how they can stretch the term 50 miles, or cannot use the name Marvel on it's East-of-the-mighty-Mississippi parks)
They absolutely can and will use the name "Marvel." There's nothing legally ambiguous here. The east of the Mississippi rule applies to THEME PARKS, of which Downtown Disney is not one.
The retail concept would not be allowed at Walt Disney World.Plus the contract has an allowance in if for a "retail concept" that Marvel was going to do develop, so Disney should have no problem using the Marvel name in conjunction with a store in DTD.
The Marvel Action Universe will not be within 60 miles of any Universal Theme Park with a THE MARVEL UNIVERSE
The retail concept would not be allowed at Walt Disney World.
This is great news, now even more reason for me not to leave Disney property.
Somehow I'm not surprised that a soccer store wouldn't be a good long-term bet in an American shopping mall.
I know, I know, we were all so Soccer-crazed for about three minutes last July during that world championship thing that no one really knew about beforehand.
It was such a trendy, fun game to pretend to be interested in that summer, wasn't it kids?
It's fairly obvious a Marvel store will have more customers in it than those photos of empty aisles displaying soccer balls.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.