• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

Does anyone else think Galaxy’s Edge is a misfire?

LindseyDisney

Active Member
Instead of converting it, why not extend that land with OG characters? Give them their own space with rides, and create a land that incorporates both timelines. This would add more rides, character experiences, etc. Will that happen? NEVER. But that’s what I would do if I were in charge.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Instead of converting it, why not extend that land with OG characters? Give them their own space with rides, and create a land that incorporates both timelines. This would add more rides, character experiences, etc. Will that happen? NEVER. But that’s what I would do if I were in charge.
…the new stuff is catastrophic 💩…to be honest

It’s a company run by ego and bad business models now…so to do any “expansion”…which they avoid like the plague…doesn’t fit
If they modify the land…it’s an acknowledgment of failure. They won’t do that. so they’ll let it rot and claim victory instead.
 

LindseyDisney

Active Member
…the new stuff is catastrophic 💩…to be honest

It’s a company run by ego and bad business models now…so to do any “expansion”…which they avoid like the plague…doesn’t fit
If they modify the land…it’s an acknowledgment of failure. They won’t do that. so they’ll let it rot and claim victory instead.
That's why I think expanding the land with OG characters is a good compromise. They don't have to admit that Galaxy's Edge was a mistake, and they can make fans who wanted the OG characters in Galaxy's Edge happy. It would also improve guest experience by expanding the land with more rides, shows, etc. But again, they will never do this.


I honestly think Disney is done with Star Wars Land for the parks
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
That's why I think expanding the land with OG characters is a good compromise. They don't have to admit that Galaxy's Edge was a mistake, and they can make fans who wanted the OG characters in Galaxy's Edge happy. It would also improve guest experience by expanding the land with more rides, shows, etc. But again, they will never do this.


I honestly think Disney is done with Star Wars Land for the parks
By adding the classic characters…it’s an automatic admission that “bobs Star Wars” can’t stand on its own.

They very deliberately tried to downplay the OT stuff at first…until what they mistakenly let LFL under Kennedy do with it (and they’re all gone except for her) failed…
They’ve pivoted to “around return of the Jedi” ever since.

If Disney ever got new management…that might be the first - most obvious - move.

But they’re not getting any new management…as it stands
 

TalkToEthan

Well-Known Member
……..not only a misfire but lousier aim than stormtroopers.

We needed both a viable script for a proper launch and a superb execution of the land——neither came close


Galaxy’s Edge with its post Return of Jedi setting was poorly conceived and its execution I’m afraid was ever worse.

In short big wig ego at the expense of honesty
 

FiestaFunKid

Well-Known Member
Look at the excitement classic Luke Skywalker generated on The Mandalorian for fans of all ages (see the youtube reactions)...we could have had that type of magic in the parks. It's not all bad, cool artifacts/details, an actual Falcon, but could have been so much more if not for hubris driven miscalculation by leadership. Side note - I don't think it feels enough like an abandoned alien outpost. I said it before, but the commonly used rocks and trees motif doesn't just stand out enough or breathe any new life.
 
Last edited:

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
……..not only a misfire but lousier aim than stormtroopers.

We needed both a viable script for a proper launch and a superb execution of the land——neither came close


Galaxy’s Edge with its post Return of Jedi setting was poorly conceived and its execution I’m afraid was ever worse.

In short big wig ego at the expense of honesty
Post return of the Jedi would sell

Like the mockup in mgm for Star tours…no one ever scoffed or thought too deeply on it

They put it in purgatory between two awful movies…

And that’s said with the phantom movie and attack of the yoda in existence 😳
 

AdventureHasAName

Well-Known Member
The three obvious solutions are:

1. Complete re-skin of the land to Return of the Jedi. All the OT main characters are still alive and you get Ewoks, Jabba, Vader, etc. You can still have the Mandalorian and Grogu and nobody is going to complain.

2. Have the timeline shift throughout the park day. Early in the morning you get walkaround characters from the prequel trilogy. In the afternoon you get original trilogy characters. In the evening you get characters from the sequel trilogy.

3. Different days mean different walkaround characters. Monday and Tuesday are prequels; Wednesday and Thursday are sequels; Friday, Saturday and Sunday are the original trilogy characters.

Personally, I would pick option #1, but I'm 50 years old. Regardless, any of these three options are better than what we currently have.
 

DisneyNittany

Well-Known Member
To be fair to Disney, I thought SWGE was the worst land in Orlando and could never be touched, but then Universal decided to create a land around a HP spin-off, that nobody liked, set in Paris, that transports you to the British MoM (which goes against that mode of travel) when the F&F area was just sitting there ready to be incorporated into the Greater London Wizarding World...
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
The three obvious solutions are:

1. Complete re-skin of the land to Return of the Jedi. All the OT main characters are still alive and you get Ewoks, Jabba, Vader, etc. You can still have the Mandalorian and Grogu and nobody is going to complain.

2. Have the timeline shift throughout the park day. Early in the morning you get walkaround characters from the prequel trilogy. In the afternoon you get original trilogy characters. In the evening you get characters from the sequel trilogy.

3. Different days mean different walkaround characters. Monday and Tuesday are prequels; Wednesday and Thursday are sequels; Friday, Saturday and Sunday are the original trilogy characters.

Personally, I would pick option #1, but I'm 50 years old. Regardless, any of these three options are better than what we currently have.
The problem is Bobby will never admit defeat…even as they sink and founder most of the times these days
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
To be fair to Disney, I thought SWGE was the worst land in Orlando and could never be touched, but then Universal decided to create a land around a HP spin-off, that nobody liked, set in Paris, that transports you to the British MoM (which goes against that mode of travel) when the F&F area was just sitting there ready to be incorporated into the Greater London Wizarding World...
Even still…they really did a good job building that land

The problems with EU is there just isn’t enough attractions

It’s a shell similar to mgm in 1989 when you factor in crowd size.

But I do agree that trying to split the baby of Harry Potter and put a chunk 5 miles away was not a great idea

Should have been in studios for multiple reasons
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom