danyoung56
Well-Known Member
On its own, the narration or the ride wasn't that great, but it was the combination that made it incredible.
Hey, that was the great Gary Owens - for me, one of the best things about the ride!
On its own, the narration or the ride wasn't that great, but it was the combination that made it incredible.
Hey, that was the great Gary Owens - for me, one of the best things about the ride!
Kinda tough to pull off what with the sponsor being Chevrolet (GM) and all. They have a history of not promoting alternate forms of transportation.I want to say in one of your videos @marni1971 , you had mentioned that a concept similar to the Test Track ride was also floated to be a part of the original pavilion in addition to the Omnimover ride. So, Test Track doesn't feel like a slap in the face the way closing JII, Horizons, or Energy did. It is in line with the spirit of the park.
That said, I wish that the Transportation pavilion explored some additional forms such as High Speed Rail, maglev, some of Elon Musk's ideas, freight, and city planning. As much as I like Test Track, a future that focuses solely on automobiles just isn't a realistic concept and frankly seems to be an outdated concept. A multi-modal transportation system does resonate, though!
I think I know what you are saying, but, that was the essence of the attraction. A serious sounding sound track almost completely contradicting the scenes that are being shown. But, it was just a way to not take the whole thing to seriously because with every advancement in transportation there was a period of trial and error while perfecting it. They just found the more gag related ones to show.Except it was elevated by being a completely different tone than the ride scenes. If you never saw the ride, you would think the narration was about something far more serious and 1950s commercial styled.
World of Motion was a wonderful ride. The details in the scenes were fantastic and it was always fun discovering some new detail with each ride. For some reason I was always fascinated by the little section that went outside the building then back in. Nothing spectacular about that, I just found it a nice touch.
And I wouldn't expect them to, though it would be nice. Even Exxon, after all, acknowledged alternative forms of energy beyond fossil fuels.Kinda tough to pull off what with the sponsor being Chevrolet (GM) and all. They have a history of not promoting alternate forms of transportation.
Except it was elevated by being a completely different tone than the ride scenes. If you never saw the ride, you would think the narration was about something far more serious and 1950s commercial styled.
You noticed that they didn't dwell on it though.And I wouldn't expect them to, though it would be nice. Even Exxon, after all, acknowledged alternative forms of energy beyond fossil fuels.
The entire backstory of "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" ironically is about the GM Streetcar Conspiracy.
I think I know what you are saying, but, that was the essence of the attraction. A serious sounding sound track almost completely contradicting the scenes that are being shown. But, it was just a way to not take the whole thing to seriously because with every advancement in transportation there was a period of trial and error while perfecting it. They just found the more gag related ones to show.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.