still going strong I see...
I see this thread has degenerated into snotty repartee as monorail threads and 5th gate threads seem to do. The point about electric generating plants causing more polution is very misguided, while it is of course true that power plants generate polution their polution is much more tightly regulated and when something in the polution control goes disfunctional it is caught and corrected very quickly. The polution stats quoted earlier are quite old I believe, from before Tampa Electric Power massively cleaned up their act, the difference has been so significant that it has even made news on Discovery. The 2 sentence synopsis was the TEPco was one of the worst poluters in the country, they alone could skew environmental numbers, and faught each and every attempt to get them to clean up their act. New management came in, decided to end the fight with the feds, spent a fortune on updating their environmental gear (even at old plants that were grandfathered), and much to no ones surprise they are now not only not heavy polluters, they are generating product more cost effectively. Monorails should be elevated so that they are not at grade and there for cannot crash into cars/trucks/busses, and of equal importance cannot be delayed by cars/trucks/busses. If you notice, the cities that have the best mass transit systems (i.e. New York, Chicago, Montreal, London) all have very large percentages that are either above grade (monorail or El-trains) or below grade (subways) and with good reason. The "no profit" argument is really a bit fallacious, using that logic then the only tings they should build are more gift shops and places to eat. No one pays to go to Test Track, Mission Space, etc. An even harder sell would be the meet and greets, no one pays for those, you have to constantly employ people for them, and still no profit. The Monorail, besides being a viable part of the transportation system, is also an attraction.