The Empress Lilly
Well-Known Member
Chapek's futurist metaverse vision has little to do with vloggers and ride-through videos. (As they exist now)
For an additional $99.99 you can buy the Metaverse Memory Maker for a year to add in-ride photos.How will I ever get my in ride photo?
“ Hey guys, welcome back to my channel. Don’t forget to SMASH that like button and ring the bell icon, as it really does help this channel. And make sure to become a PATREON if you consider yourself a super fan ”How do you distinguish between recording for an ad-supported YouTube channel
The best VR I have ever experienced was the VOID at disney springs.. The cool part about that is it was VR combined with physical elements. When you could reach out to pull a lever and the lever was actually there... I am so sad that company didn't survive covid. They were doing everything right when it came to a VR experience.No matter how good the VR is, unless we reach Star Trek holodeck technology, it's not going to be the same as actually going to the parks. Heck, even in Star Trek, people still prefer to go take actual trips to just seeing things on the holodeck. My point is that I don't think this kind of experience could ever actually replace visiting the parks themselves. I see it as complementary, not as a replacement.
I hope that shipping is included for my popcorn bucket refills.For an additional $99.99 you can buy the Metaverse Memory Maker for a year to add in-ride photos.
Or for $199.99 you can buy the Metaverse Memory Maker + to add yourself into any scene you want.*
* subject to a limit of one scene per person per ride.
Extra magical add-ons will be available just as soon as we can fully realise the monetising opportunities this presents us with.
TheI hope that shipping is included for my popcorn bucket refills.
Will they add realism and have a VRVQ for new rides and you have to be up by 7 to maybe get one?No matter how good the VR is, unless we reach Star Trek holodeck technology, it's not going to be the same as actually going to the parks. Heck, even in Star Trek, people still prefer to go take actual trips to just seeing things on the holodeck. My point is that I don't think this kind of experience could ever actually replace visiting the parks themselves. I see it as complementary, not as a replacement.
Every single person I know (including myself) who bought an Oculus has used it for a few weeks then stopped using it altogether. I strongly believe VR is a novelty, like 3D TVs.No matter how good the VR is, unless we reach Star Trek holodeck technology, it's not going to be the same as actually going to the parks. Heck, even in Star Trek, people still prefer to go take actual trips to just seeing things on the holodeck. My point is that I don't think this kind of experience could ever actually replace visiting the parks themselves. I see it as complementary, not as a replacement.
The first few videos on YouTube of rides I found are:I don't think a ton of people are going to YouTube just to watch attractions,
Hi, I'm one of those people.Every single person I know (including myself) who bought an Oculus has used it for a few weeks then stopped using it altogether. I strongly believe VR is a novelty, like 3D TVs.
Meta talks about how many units they’ve sold, but never talks about whether those units are actually utilized.
Those are all roller coaster channels, not Disney vlogs. It's a different category.The first few videos on YouTube of rides I found are:
*Everest 24 million views
*Space 10 million views
*Splash 5.5 million views
I think it's a much bigger thing than you might think.
I'm not sure what it matters. You said people don't seek out ride videos on YouTube. It doesn't matter the channel, people are looking for them. The first rise of the resistance video has over 8 million and pirates has almost 5. Regardless of where the video is coming from, people are seeking them out.Those are all roller coaster channels, not Disney vlogs. It's a different category.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.