“But not in my backyard!”
You know what?
Come live in my backyard. Even better, come drive north on 535 at 7:30 AM on a weekday.
“But not in my backyard!”
Looks like it's in Quadrant 8 of CFTOD map.
View attachment 882529
View attachment 882531
A high school (Horizon's High School) is near it.
View attachment 882530
I do live in the area.You know what?
Come live in my backyard. Even better, come drive north on 535 at 7:30 AM on a weekday.
I do live in the area.
It isn’t the complex that is doing this. It is the intentional design of the area’s planning.Then you should understand what this 1400 unit complex will do to an area that already is a traffic nightmare.
This make s no sense.Where is there an abundance of infrastructure with empty school rooms, extra lanes of hardly-used roads, and other under-utilized utilities such that one can build a dense amount of domiciles in that area and the existing infrastructure can immediately handle it?
You don't live there. They did speak up.That infrastructure can be done smartly or poorly. It's up to all of us to demand our government representatives do so smartly.
again nonsense. You can not pile on a bad system and call it good.And it's up to all of us to understand what "smartly" means. Stroads, car-dependency, and suburban sprawl aren't smart.
Where will people live that will not cause over run?again nonsense. You can not pile on a bad system and call it good.
The area is already over run. why add to that?
A little place on the other side of the county called Bithlo (or Christmas). They'll protest worse than Horizon West has, but you'll need significantly less infrastructure (just maybe a new school, but it wouldn't have to be terribly big). That's one of the few places you could put it where infrastructure is much less of a concern because barely anyone lives there!Where is there an abundance of infrastructure with empty school rooms, extra lanes of hardly-used roads, and other under-utilized utilities such that one can build a dense amount of domiciles in that area and the existing infrastructure can immediately handle it?
A little place on the other side of the county called Bithlo (or Christmas). They'll protest worse than Horizon West has, but you'll need significantly less infrastructure (just maybe a new school, but it wouldn't have to be terribly big). That's one of the few places you could put it where infrastructure is much less of a concern because barely anyone lives there!
Where will people live that will not cause over run?
Because, almost everywhere, the infrastructure was built to match the number of houses that were built, with no extra give.
This means any new development exceeds the infrastructure and new infrastructure needs to be built.
This prevents areas from becoming more densely populated... which is the plan of suburban homesteaders and the car industry.
The alternative is continuing suburban sprawl until the entire land is nothing but one-bedroom homes; and hundreds of thousands of people need to drive over an hour to and fro every day... in just one county. Repeat everywhere.
That infrastructure can be done smartly or poorly. It's up to all of us to demand our government representatives do so smartly.
I hate to say it but there's no transportation worth a darn where this development is going to be built anyway! The county saying a bus is enough for everything outside of downtown basically, is incredibly irresponsible but what can you really do when Orlando has the steadiest source of income and the most power, but doesn't want anything to benefit the bits they don't own?Which means there's no public transportation option for those who would be living in such a development.
The nearby area is built up enough that said transportation (and other things) should already exist.First they build the development, then they build the transportation. They have to create a problem to fix it, Right? I don't see any talk of Section 8, yet. I New Orleans, that how our history went. First development, then available shopping, then transportation, and finally low income and Section 8.
The design of the area makes transit inconvenient and difficult to provide. We’ve known dead ends are bad for density, transit and just general urban efficiency for a very long time.The nearby area is built up enough that said transportation (and other things) should already exist.
FYI, that map is outdated. Before Disney donated the land, RCID de-annexed the property from the district.Looks like it's in Quadrant 8 of CFTOD map.
View attachment 882529
View attachment 882531
A high school (Horizon's High School) is near it.
View attachment 882530
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.