James Alucobond
Well-Known Member
Bay Lake Tower already exists, which would make it confusing if they weren't part of the same resort complex.Why can’t it just be called BAY LAKE Lodge?
Bay Lake Tower already exists, which would make it confusing if they weren't part of the same resort complex.Why can’t it just be called BAY LAKE Lodge?
I think the association with be the same with the The Cabins at Disney's Fort Wilderness Resort, so yes - legacy non-Direct DVC owners will not be able to book there.
I’d say it’s almost guaranteed to be a Trust property.I thought so too. But the language is not what I expected it to be. It is calling it a new property. There's no embedded reference to Fort Wildness and the Cabins are even called out as a different property.
In addition to that, if they've truly dropped the cash component, it is way too big of a resort to also throw the cabins into. I'd also have expected them to lean into the blending to start sparking interest in the Cabins.
There is still a chance it is a trust property and we see that speculated new DVC trust model occur, like was formerly speculated.
But at this stage there’s no reason to say anything about it’s “status” as to being part of the Cabins at FW or separate. The Poly Tower wasn’t confirmed as such until much closer.
Yes, a strong pool complex would be necessary for me to stay at such a remote property. If it’s part of the Cabins DVC and they can also use the new pool, it would help sell those as well. I have no interest in staying at Fort Wilderness in its present state.Maybe it's only for us nostalgia purists, but I would have preferred The River Country Lodge - with that rustic ol' fashioned swimming hole more classic feeling Disney theming - with the obvious nod to it's history/location.
They could get creative/innovative with the water slides as a differentiator.
But it is a lodge, no? On the shore of Bay Lake. Between Ft. Wilderness and the Wilderness Lodge. I really don't want them to overthink thisExcept Wilderness Lodge did it first. And then it was copied by Great Wolf Lodge. It's not like they should just keep putting lodge after everything. Even Animal Kingdom Lodge is an uncreative name.
We can't be surprised about this though. Disney has built plenty of charmless hotels since the beginning. Peter Dominick delivered some home runs under Eisner but that's only 3 hotels.There is nothing about that modern Fairfield Inn building that looks like a "Lodge"... More like an apartment or urban condo building... It looks charmless and like something you could find just about anywhere. Maybe they have a vacation photo of walt near a lake which will become the entire theme ...literally that one photo on the lobby... Walt went to a lake...so we present Disney's Marriott inspired Lakeside vacation apartments complex tm
There is nothing about that modern Fairfield Inn building that looks like a "Lodge"... More like an apartment or urban condo building... It looks charmless and like something you could find just about anywhere. Maybe they have a vacation photo of walt near a lake which will become the entire theme ...literally that one photo on the lobby... Walt went to a lake...so we present Disney's Marriott inspired Lakeside vacation apartments complex tm
Because it's not going to be a dull grey concrete monstrosity.Why can’t it just be called BAY LAKE Lodge?
Just vomit up some Incredibles theming all over it, and it will be perfect for present day Disney.Because it's not going to be a dull grey concrete monstrosity.
Because it's not going to be a dull grey concrete monstrosity.
Wait, that looks just like the Contemporary!
Phase 2, The Contemporary Lakeside Lodge by Disney Vacation ClubWait, that looks just like the Contemporary!
What do you think a "Lakeside Lodge" looks like? Does that name conjure an image of a Fairfield Inn or Springhill Suites?So what does a lakeshore lodge supposed to look like?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.